Orange County NC Website
~~_ ~l lJ ~~ ~ 13 ~~~ <br />1 Bernadette Pelissier: Yes, I had questions about the water and sewer. I guess on page 5, <br />2 there's a reference to this being within the Water and Sewer Management Boundary <br />3 Agreement. I don't know what agreement there specifically exists. I guess the specific <br />4 questions I have are, 1 know there are other tracts of land that are a part of this EDD that are not <br />5 in question here, and I am wondering if there are long-range plans that the Town of Mebane has <br />6 about what's the capacity to actually serve the remaining area of the EDD, and how would it be <br />7 impacted by this type of development here that's not light industrial. What else could you do on <br />8 the adjacent property? I'd like to know a little bit more about that. Are there any discussions <br />9 about whether or not Mebane would intent on annexing any of the property since it's so close. I <br />10 think that's something we really need to look at. I'd like to see that there's some agreement <br />11 here with Mebane, and I don't know what's going on. <br />12 <br />13 Chair Jacobs: We'll get to that. <br />14 <br />15 Michelle Kempinski: The first one has to do with the types of uses that are being requested as <br />16 . part of the planned development. On pages 15-16, it talks about that there's a series of places <br />17 for District I, II, and III. For example, District I lists retail trade as the uses. And then ~ . <br />18 accommodation, retail, finance/insurance, services in District II. Retail, services, residential, <br />19 and government in District III. The concern that I have is, not in that they're listed, but in the <br />20 specificity and the intended use. Because on page 17 there is a conversion table that allows <br />21 you flexibility of converting one to another based on design factors that will convert retail to <br />22 condos, or theater to retail, and so on and so forth. I. would have a concern that the conversion <br />23 factor is a part of the application, because then it's not a specified use. If you could outline the <br />24 reason for the table on page 17, and what are some of the tentative scenarios that you would <br />25 expect to see that would lead you to request that there be a conversion factor as part of the <br />'?6 specified use. <br />L7 <br />28 Jim Parker: That was one of the questions that we responded to, basically what does retail use <br />29 mean, what does that encompass. We gave some outline items in our response as well as the <br />30 services.. We responded to those and you'll see that. The conversion table is to convert theater <br />31 seats, hotel rooms, and condos from retail square footage. <br />32 <br />33 Michelle Kempinski: In one direction only? . <br />34 <br />35 Jim Parker: You could go either way. The intent of that table was so that it does not <br />36 contaminate or change the traffic generation numbers that had been provided in the TIP,. For <br />37 example, and these are just numbers that I'm pulling out of my head, so they mean absolutely <br />38 nothing. For example, we.have 20,000 trips that are coming to this development based on the <br />39 land use plan that you have now and the square footage that you have in front of you in the <br />40 three district tables. We could use that conversion factor, the way that it's spelled out, and <br />41 those 20,000 trips don't change. They're still 20,000 trips. That was the reason for that table. <br />42 There's some level of flexibility built into this plan in order for us to be able to determine an end. <br />43 Is there one theater, is there one hotel, or are there two hotels with 400 rooms, or one hotel with <br />44 200 rooms? You can't just add that, you need to be able to balance the background. <br />45 <br />46 Michelle Kempinski: I understand the implications of the traffc analysis, my concern is that <br />47 uses need to be specified in the special use permit and not be provisional as part of the <br />48 ordinance. Also, my concern would be that, for example, 200 condos may be deemed as an <br />49 undesirable use in the district after the application is approved, and the conversion table would <br />50 be used because it was also approved to delete those 200 condos and swap them out for retail. <br />51 That's a concern that I have. <br />