Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5d - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

"~i.~~ Access roads off of Buckhorn seem to be too much. One (1) access road should be sufficient. ®. Align driveways with Petro to avoid conflicts. m Waiver requests should be spelled out and not just requesting a blanket waiver. ® Plan is just weird. ® Lighting. a Green building standards should be employed. ® Buffer (MTC) should be respected a little more. o Terry Hackett: ® Seventy (70) percent impervious surface -will not comply with Neuse regulations (nitrogen loading, etc). Stormwater will be a problem if this is the intended impervious surface load. No net increase in twenty-four (24) hour storm will be allowed per Neuse rules. ® Need to consider the possibility of lot leveUon-site bio-retention in concert with a stormwater plan for the development project. d This project will more than likely be subject to a NPDS permit. o Karen Lincoln.: ® No connectivity within EDD, we need to look at that. ~~ •Design should be rethought to encourage more open space to alleviate the `sea of asphalt' created by the numerous parking lots. ® TIA does not address potential impact on surrounding intersections that will be impacted by this development. The TIA needs to address changes to these intersections to handle traffic load. o Daryl Russell (Mebane Engineer): Most of my comments have already been made. o Susan: Need building plans. o Gene: Public hearing packet needs to go out on time. February 15, 2008 the packet has to go out to BOCC. This is going to be a big hearing and we may need to flunk about moving the meeting room to accommodate more people. o Sheriff: My interest is man power staff and who is responsible for what. Our focus will change to external issues once the project is completed. Does Mebane have an opinion if the roadways will betaken over once it is completed. Ingress and egress is what we are concerned about during construction and after construction is completed. Who will be responsible for various access points of the project. 5