Orange County NC Website
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />5 <br />taxes. He said in order to make this financing more solid, they are requesting that Orange <br />County give back some of the incremental taxes. He said the County would pay no more than <br />half of the increment and no more than half of the debt service ($800,000 /year which would be <br />$400,000 /year for the cost to Orange County). <br />Ken Pennoyer said the town has passed the first hurdle of approving the zoning, and <br />this will help begin the actual development project. He said the town is looking to put together <br />the debt funding package and the repayment plan, to include both the Town and the County <br />pledging those tax increments. He said the Town is taking the risk of a shortfall in the tax <br />increments should the projects be delayed or the tax increments not come in on the predicted <br />timeframe. He said the Town will pay for the debt service through its debt management fund. <br />Chair Jacobs said based on this model the Town is not asking Orange County to lay out <br />any funding up front, and the County would only be responsible for a portion of moneys that <br />would potentially be generated. <br />Ken Pennoyer said the maximum would be 50 percent of any additional incremental tax <br />revenue that comes in. He said a current baseline would be set, and anything after the re- <br />zoning would constitute an increment for the purposes of calculating the tax increment. <br />Michael Talbert said he has discussed this with Roger Stancil. He said the County does <br />have a re- evaluation in 2017 but that would have no impact. He asked for information about the <br />type of document that would need to be approved, and how this would impact the County. <br />Bob Jessup said the County may only have a resolution of intent to consider this <br />appropriation of incremental taxes annually; the nature of the obligation would not change if <br />there was an actual paper contract. He said the commitment would be expressed as a <br />renewing annual commitment that would occur during the budget season. He said it is very <br />easy to describe the nature of the commitment. He said the other benefit with the County's <br />participation, is that it may allow the overall financing term to be squeezed down a bit. <br />Michael Talbert asked for a breakdown of the anticipated bond schedule and whether <br />this would count against the County's debt limit or credit rating. <br />Bob Jessup said this would not count as outstanding County debt; but there would be <br />some sort of note disclosure of the commitment, and the parties would all know. <br />Chair Jacobs noted that this project has been approved by the town and at this point the <br />County is being asked for support of the proposal through a partnership. He said before this <br />reaches a decision point, it would be brought before the public. He said there may be <br />differences of opinion regarding the merits of how this was re- zoned, but that is not the issue <br />before the Board. <br />Chair Jacobs said the town wants the County to be on board as quickly as possible, but <br />they also need to be comfortable before moving forward on this as a decision item. He would <br />like to make sure there is time for due consideration. <br />Commissioner Rich asked about the type of financing, which has been called tax <br />increment financing and project development financing. <br />Ken Pennoyer said this is referred to as synthetic tax increment financing; the <br />development financing refers to financing done through state statutory tax increment financing. <br />He said this is a different model that is based on an installment financing that is secured by an <br />asset. He said this is being combined with the financing for the newly renovated Town Hall, <br />which will act as collateral for the asset. He said the synthetic tax increment financing is <br />preferred over the state statutory because it uses a standard method, which looks more solid <br />because it is backed by an asset. <br />Commissioner Rich said the way the tax base is being projected is based on how the <br />Town sees the project growing, and then the Town Hall is being used as a backup asset. She <br />asked if this is correct. <br />