Agenda - 10-07-2014 - 6a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 11 Michael Harvey said he cannot think of a situation where an extension would not be allowed. James Bryan said special use permits require a quasi - judicial decision and a fair trial standard. He said this is ill defined, but there are principles of equity and fairness, so you cannot repeatedly continue an application as a means of delay. He said you need to articulate a reason for delaying. Commissioner McKee said he agrees with most of what is being said. He wants to make sure there is transparency for the public, and no one is blindsided. He said this discussion is about the time before a public hearing, and he notes that there is no guarantee that an item will pass once it gets to a public hearing. He said there has already been a lot of talk over the years about the time that it takes to get a project to completion, and he agrees with the staff recommendation of 30 days. He thinks a longer time frame would extend the time frame too much. Commissioner Rich asked if the Board is going to re -visit the previous question about solar companies and how other governments have handled these. Michael Harvey said this update will be presented at the October 7t" meeting. Pete Hallenbeck said he has lots of notes for the Planning Board, and he is sees the following four main issues: 1) Determining the number of days prior to the first public hearing, as well as the idea of informing the public of new applications as soon as these become public, 2) the need for more details on the information that an applicant must provide at the public information meeting, 3) determining who owns the information and details — the planning department or the applicant, and 4) determining the most convenient location and hours of meetings. Pete Hallenbeck invited comments from the Planning Board members. Tony Blake said the issue that seems to be missing for him is the 500 feet requirement. He said this is probably adequate notice in town or in subdivision areas, but in the County you may not have a neighbor within 500 feet. He noted that the issue with the placement of the fire station involved complaints from people half a mile away. He said it was also not clear to him who the applicant was in the case of the fire station. Lydia Wegman said she is speaking as a member of the Planning Board and as a member of the public. She said she has concern about 30 days, and this time would have been insufficient for her neighborhood in the case of the solar project. She said only 17 days was allowed to get information to a neighborhood of 90 homes. She said 30 days is an improvement, but this is a quasi - judicial process, and it involves attorneys and appraisers. She has suggested 90 days, but even 45 would be better, because it takes a lot of effort, time, and money to organize a neighborhood if there is a project of concern. Chair Jacobs said there is a lot to consider. Michael Harvey asked if there is any consensus from the Board regarding what timeline they would like the staff and Planning Board to review. Chair Jacobs said he thinks the two options are 30 days or 45 days. Commissioner Price expressed her support of Tony Blake's comments regarding the extension of the 500 foot limit. She feels it should be greater in the rural area. A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Price for the Board to: Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be returned to the County Board of Commissioners in time for the November 18, 2014 BOCC regular meeting. Adjourn the public hearing until November 18, 2014 in order to receive and accept the Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. VOTE: UNANIMOUS