Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-07-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 10-07-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 10-07-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2015 11:05:32 AM
Creation date
10/3/2014 11:29:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/7/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-07-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />0 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />Adjourn the public hearing until November 6, 2014 in order to receive and accept the Planning <br />Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments, as well as the additional <br />information requested. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />Chair Jacobs said when this comes back he would like to see the planning area maps <br />that were used when planning with Hillsborough. <br />Chair Jacobs said, given the possible moves by the state legislature regarding ETJs, he <br />would like to see a report from the planning staff about which areas of the County are ETJs with <br />all four towns that are not jointly planned. <br />4. Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment - To review government- <br />initiated amendments to the text of the UDO to require that a neighborhood information <br />meeting be held at least 30 days prior to the public hearing regarding applications for a <br />Class A or Class B Special Use Permit. <br />Michael Harvey said the next item on the agenda starts on page 61. He referred to the <br />paper copies of two emails, as well as the three attachments in the abstract. <br />He reviewed the background information and said at the May 27 Public Hearing, <br />concerns were expressed by the Board that neighborhood meetings were not required for <br />special use permits. He said staff noted that neighborhood meetings are currently required for <br />all major subdivisions, conditional use and rezoning applications, as well as those individual <br />land uses categorized as government uses. He said a neighborhood meeting is an opportunity <br />for surrounding property owners to receive a presentation from the applicant providing a <br />synopsis of the proposed project, as well to ask questions. <br />Michael Harvey said staff keeps a record of this meeting, which is provided to the <br />applicant, as well the Planning Board and the County Commissioners. <br />He said this amendment proposes this same process be required for all special use <br />permits, both Class A and Class B. He said staff is proposing this meeting should occur 30 <br />days prior to a public hearing, and notifications would go our 15 days prior to that. <br />Michael Harvey said staff has been coordinating this with the County Attorney's Office, <br />and there have been some proposed language /word choice changes that will be made. He said <br />staff will also incorporate comments from this evening <br />Commissioner Pelissier asked how staff picked the timeframe of 30 days. <br />Michael Harvey said 30 days was chosen because that is what is required for major <br />subdivisions and government uses. He said conditional zoning requests only require 2 weeks, <br />as these are a legislative decision and they are less complex. <br />Commissioner Price asked if there are any guidelines about the location and the hours <br />for these meetings. <br />Michael Harvey said these meetings are typically held during the day, because that is <br />when staff and the applicant can attend. He said he is aware of the concern that these may <br />need to be held at an appropriate hour to guarantee mass attendance, but these will have to be <br />coordinated with when the applicant can be available. <br />Commissioner Price said that would be her concern. She suggested a set of guidelines <br />within the department. <br />Commissioner Rich said she has some concerns about the 30 day notice. She wonders <br />if there is another way to let the neighbors know what is going on. <br />Michael Harvey referred to page 80 and the typical timeline for the submittal of a special <br />use permit applications. He said applications for a Class A special use permit are submitted 60 <br />days prior to a public hearing. He said the timeline that has to be followed means that a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.