Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-07-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 10-07-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 10-07-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2015 11:05:32 AM
Creation date
10/3/2014 11:29:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/7/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-07-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />16 <br />about a 17,000 square foot building. He referred to page 8 of the abstract, and said 15,000 <br />square feet of the center would be interior space, and 2,000 would be outside demonstration <br />area. Commissioner Gordon said this agricultural center Commissioner Jacobs was talking <br />about was something different. <br />Jeff Thompson said the interior space would remain the same, but the exterior space <br />that interfaces with the larger acreage is different and makes a lot of sense. <br />Commissioner Gordon said there are two different things being looked at here, one is <br />the reconfigured office space for the agencies, and the other is the conception of an agricultural <br />center. <br />Dave Stancil said there is a lot of interest in this center due to the idea of a large <br />meeting area. <br />Commissioner Gordon said there are two different concepts being looked at and it may <br />be good to talk about phasing or even two different buildings. She said it make sense to her to <br />do a new building. <br />Paul Laughton reviewed Attachment C regarding the new jail project. He said there is a <br />total price of $30 million budgeted for design and construction. He said the major construction <br />was to be in year 4 with a 250 bed capacity. He said there was discussion of breaking the <br />project up into segments or pods. He said this is what is outlined on page 10. He said <br />$500,000 was kept for design and professional services in year 2 and 3, and the year 4 <br />construction was kept, looking at a revised plan. He said there is an expansion concept shown <br />on pages 12 and 13. He said this contains 3 different segments or pods with a wide range of <br />beds and capacity. He said the new amount of $23.76 million in construction is basically for a <br />jail with a 216 bed capacity. He said this 216 bed concept could also be done in pods. <br />Chair Jacobs asked Cheryl Young to come up to microphone since she is the support <br />staff for the Jail Alternatives Work Group. He said there has been some discussion about the <br />size of the pods. <br />Cheryl Young said this is extremely preliminary, as it relates to the pod concept. She <br />said there is still a lot of time to work on this. She said 221 is the topped out sum of 140 local <br />inmates plus the current contracted 75 inmates. <br />Chair Jacobs asked if Sheriff Pendergrass had any comments about the jail concept. <br />Sherriff Pendergrass said this project will need to go forward. He said the daily capacity <br />last year was 130 inmates per day, and there was an average of 65 federal inmates daily last <br />year. He said there will need to be at least a 250 bed jail in the near future due to the impact <br />from state decisions. <br />Commissioner McKee said he hopes staff is working with the sheriff's department on the <br />actual layout and design to make sure it works on a daily basis on the ground. <br />John Sellew said the consultant has been working with them on the preliminary <br />sketches. <br />Commissioner Gordon said the state may be changing requirements and she asked if <br />the prisoners will have to go to another County if there is not enough space. <br />John Sellew said the only alternative if there were not capacity would be to farm these <br />inmates out to other counties and pay whatever price is being charged. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the advantages and disadvantages of taking federal <br />inmates. She said her understanding is that the average net income to Orange County for this <br />relationship is $268,000 in net revenue. She said the capital cost is $7.5 million. She said if <br />you divide this out, it takes 28 years to reach $7.5 million. She asked for an explanation of the <br />economy of taking federal prisoners. <br />Sheriff said he does not know that this can be explained. He said over the last 30 years <br />the County has probably raised about $60 million from the federal government that could have <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.