Orange County NC Website
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />15 <br />Paul Laughton said staff is just asking for comments. He said attachment B also shows <br />a scenario for an environment and agriculture building on Revere Road, since this has been <br />taken out of Blackwood Farm. He said staff is happy to prepare other options if the Board has <br />any suggestions. <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked for an explanation of the $147,000 listed in year one. <br />Paul Laughton said this includes trail constructions, restrooms, parking issues, <br />equipment, and activities as part of a limited opening. <br />Dave Stancil said staff is looking at trying to get this facility open on a limited basis by <br />transferring some existing parks capital funds from other projects. He said this would include <br />building trails, improving and adding to the parking area, improving the existing driveway, and <br />possibly creating a picnic shelter, as well as signage throughout the site. He said the vision is <br />to have this open 2 -3 days per week. <br />Paul Laughton said the next project is outlined in Attachment B with the deconstruction <br />and reconstruction of an environment and agricultural center. He said this shows the <br />estimated project budget for a 15,000 square foot main building, as well as 2,000 square feet of <br />covered storage and yard area. He said this shows the intent of having a building there where <br />the operations and work at the current building can continue undisturbed during the <br />construction process. He said deconstruction of the old building would happen after the new <br />structure was built. <br />He said the original estimates for this location looked only at keeping the existing <br />structure as it is now, and doing repairs on the roof, HVAC and parking area to extend the life <br />expectancy. The cost for this was listed as $1.4 million in year 4. He said this new construction <br />project was also put in year 4 to show a comparison, and it comes to $3.38 million. <br />Commissioner McKee said the use of the term "life expectancy" bothers him when used <br />for a building. He feels the focus should be on the condition of the building and the necessary <br />repairs to keep it going. He said there is a danger to assigning a life expectancy on a building <br />because you are setting up an expectation that it will be replaced. <br />Chair Jacobs asked about the size of the Revere Road parcel. <br />Jeff Thompson said it is 4 acres and there are 3 structures on the property: Revere <br />Road Center, Station One, and a storage facility. <br />Chair Jacobs said he would like to see a full analysis of what the agricultural center <br />could be on this site. He said there were recommendations and ideas that have not been <br />incorporated in this plan. He would like to see if this could be more than just a building, and he <br />would like to do a more comprehensive look at this property and the potential interface between <br />interior and exterior areas. He feels that this is an opportunity that should be taken advantage <br />of. He said the best use of the old carwash area would be to have it open for other agricultural <br />related uses, instead of storage. <br />Commissioner Gordon said she would like to hear from David Stancil what he feels <br />would be appropriate for this building. <br />David Stancil said this location has proven to be a good location for the agricultural <br />community. He said the building has the capability to continue to serve in that capacity, but it is <br />intriguing to look at whether the site could be built on without taking down the original structure. <br />He thinks the idea of keeping the agricultural agencies together is a good idea. <br />Commissioner Gordon said there are also all of the offices, in addition to the agricultural <br />space. She asked if the building built for $3.38 million would be intended to have the same <br />functions. <br />Jeff Thompson said staff has met extensively with the all of the agricultural center <br />occupants. He said the space is inefficient and redundant, with County storage right in the <br />middle of it. He said there was discussion of the convenience of shared customer service <br />areas, individual partition areas, secured uses, and built in growth, and this came out to be <br />