Browse
Search
Minutes 05-13-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 05-13-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:24:41 AM
Creation date
9/17/2014 8:46:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/13/2014
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-13-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-13-2014 - Work Session - Late
Agenda - 05-13-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-13-2014 - Joint Mtg. - Board of Health - Early
Agenda - 05-13-2014 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-13-2014 - Work Session - Late
Agenda - 05-13-2014 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-13-2014 - Work Session - Late
Agenda - 05-13-2014 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-13-2014 - Work Session - Late
Agenda - 05-13-2014 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-13-2014 - Work Session - Late
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
whole agreement, but she is interested in knowing what their professionals say about how this <br /> might be done for a limited section. <br /> John Roberts said this is a very basic and broad document that is presented as the only <br /> thing that could possibly get approved by July 1St. He said there are key portions of this, such <br /> as recycling, where major decisions still have to be made. He said whatever is done with this <br /> document or another document, key aspects will need to be amended in the future. He said <br /> this is not something that can be done comprehensively between now and July 1St <br /> Commissioner Pelissier asked what needs to be done to be sure recycling can be in <br /> place by next year. <br /> Chair Jacobs said this could be considered a preliminary interlocal agreement, which <br /> means it is a starting point. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier asked if a preliminary agreement means having something to <br /> get them through next year, and maybe even simplifying it more. She said a group would then <br /> be formed to flesh it out. <br /> Chair Jacobs said yes. <br /> Michael Talbert said this is an outline that could be something much broader at a later <br /> date. He said an advisory group could be asked to work out the details with elected officials <br /> from each unit of local government. He said the document could then be brought back to the <br /> Board in a year for a major amendment. <br /> Commissioner Price said this document does not seem comprehensive. She said there <br /> are a lot of elements all over the place, and she feels that if towns are going to be involved this <br /> needs to be a comprehensive solid waste project. She said if this document has to be used, <br /> she would ask that Labor Day be included as a holiday. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked what happens if this is not done by July 1St <br /> John Roberts said there is no current agreement, so you would still be maintaining the <br /> status quo. He said the towns still need to approve the recommended fees for recycling in <br /> their jurisdictions, but he does not see any legal change if this is not approved. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he is not interested in doing a piecemeal agreement <br /> because he thinks it reduces the County's negotiating ability. He feels the current solid waste <br /> program is piecemeal and confusing. He is not concerned with a July deadline, and he would <br /> rather go on with the status quo and then try and get this document right. He is not okay with <br /> the towns building a transfer station and not allowing the County to use it and vice versa. He <br /> said if Orange County is going to be responsible for its own trash, the County will need to build <br /> a transfer station. He would be fine to let this ride out until an agreement can be reached. He <br /> said an advisory board should be done before putting in a piecemeal agreement. <br /> Michael Talbert said if that is the Board's pleasure then staff can be directed, along with <br /> the towns, to refine this agreement over the summer and come back with a revised agreement <br /> by the first meeting in the fall. He said it could then be taken to the Assembly of Governments <br /> (AOG) meeting for discussion of the political issues that staff is not able to negotiate. <br /> Chair Jacobs said he feels that this document is very County centric. He would like to <br /> indicate that the County is amenable to an agreement that is more mutually satisfactory. He <br /> suggested an advisory group could contain two elected officials from each of the four <br /> governments, one representative from UNC, three citizens, and whatever staff the group <br /> deems appropriate. He said this would be a workable group, and he suggests that there be a <br /> specific timeframe to have an outline in time for the AOG meeting in November. He said <br /> everyone will want to make decisions in time for the 2015-16 budget year. He said the <br /> direction would be to create a comprehensive solid waste strategy that includes solid waste, <br /> bio-solids, food waste, and short and long term plans. He said if a plan of action can be <br /> created and the AOG can agree to go forward, then they would at least have a framework of a <br /> comprehensive plan with stages that allow them to address something next budget year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.