Browse
Search
Minutes 04-10-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 04-10-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:22:05 AM
Creation date
9/17/2014 8:05:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/10/2014
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-10-2014 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 04-10-2014 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 04-10-2014 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 04-10-2014 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 04-10-2014 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 04-10-2014 - Budget Work Session
Agenda - 04-10-2014 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 04-10-2014 - Budget Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a discussion point for the past years, but this year the SAPFO numbers have been considered, <br /> and that moves this to 2023. <br /> He said Elementary number 8 for OCS will open in 23-24. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked how the move back of Cedar Ridge is valid if Mebane is <br /> not providing SAPFO numbers. <br /> Paul Laughton said this has been on the table for discussion for 2 or 3 years, but this <br /> movement is based on the SAPFO numbers. <br /> Craig Benedict said even though Mebane is not part of the formal SAPFO, when <br /> children do show up from the Mebane communities, they are counted. He said projections are <br /> historical and actual, so if there is an uptick in enrollment from development on the Orange <br /> County side of Mebane, those projections will be modified. He said there is a "ghost" count of <br /> the development to see if children are showing up as a result of this growth. He said these <br /> projections are very sensitive, and they are closely monitored. <br /> Commissioner McKee said his question was based on the amount of the jump. <br /> Commissioner Price said she is still not clear on the monitoring of Mebane. She asked <br /> where this shows up in the CIP and whether it is possible to include a footnote. <br /> Craig Benedict said projections are based on the children who show up at the schools; <br /> so Mebane is being counted from that standpoint. He said projections are taken based off of <br /> what has happening over the last 5 or 10 years, so Mebane's growth is counted. <br /> Commissioner Price said parents and teachers were saying that classes at Cedar <br /> Ridge were being held in hallways. She questioned if this indicates the need for classroom <br /> additions sooner rather than later. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said people talk about how certain schools are overcrowded. <br /> She said the trigger for building more capacity comes when the level goes up for all of the <br /> schools in that category. She said Chapel Hill has a lot of Elementary schools and some are <br /> overcrowded while others are not. She said it is the responsibility of the school system to <br /> redistrict. She said the same is true for OCS, and in this case Orange High School is not being <br /> used to capacity, while Cedar Ridge is at capacity. She said when the capacity of both high <br /> schools reaches 110 percent, SAPFO kicks in. She said the rationale is to have the space <br /> ready by the time you reach 110 percent. <br /> Commissioner Price suggested that the Board bring this to the attention of the schools, <br /> and hope it will be corrected. <br /> Chair Jacobs said yes. He noted that it is challenging to redistrict. <br /> Commissioner Price asked about the schools in Orange County where the students are <br /> in trailers, and she questioned the safety of this. <br /> Chair Jacobs said it is part of the school comprehensive plan. <br /> Commissioner porosin referred to page 91. He questioned, given what staff said about <br /> the timetable for new schools, what the money listed as new school allotments for years 1 <br /> through 5 would be used for. <br /> Paul Laughton said that is strictly pay as you go funds and lottery proceeds. <br /> Commissioner porosin asked if the Board has any control over how this is spent. <br /> Paul Laughton said this is part of the request in the CIP document. He said the schools <br /> have shown how they would like to spend this on repairs and replacements. He said there are <br /> budget amendments every year regarding the lottery funds. He said staff receives quarterly <br /> notification of the money available in the system, and then the schools can request the money. <br /> He said this is then brought to the Board as a budget amendment each time. <br /> Commissioner porosin clarified that the only thing that would show up on their itemized <br /> list would be new school construction items, and the rest shows up in the CIPs submitted by <br /> the schools. <br /> Paul Laughton said yes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.