Orange County NC Website
I <br />c1: <br />Support legislation to explore and authorize use of alternate, sustainable revenue options or <br />funding sources like licenses, taxes and /or fees for beach, inlet and waterway maintenance (as <br />proposed via 2009 CRC and CRAC resolution for Trust Fund; Senate DRS 85164 -SB -12 Beach <br />Management Study Commission Section 2.2 (3) Trust Fund, 2012 Session H1181 Study <br />Municipal Local Option Sales Tax, and 2004 Session H142 Dare County Sale Tax). <br />TF -8: Replace current non-profit sales tax refund process with a revenue - neutral exemption. <br />Support legislation to eliminate the requirement for tax - exempt non - profit corporations to pay <br />sales tax. The current burdensome process, which requires the eligible non - profits to pay sales <br />taxes and then seek a refund from the State has resulted in significant negative impacts upon <br />county budgets. Sales tax revenues received by the local governments that include payments <br />from tax - exempt corporations overstate the amount of funding actually available to the local <br />government, and state audit adjustments result in unpredictable repayment obligations over <br />which the local government has no control. <br />TF -9: Replace current refund sales tax process for public institutions with a revenue - neutral <br />exemption. <br />Seek legislation that streamlines the sales tax refund regulatory process by exempting public <br />institutions (counties, cities, school boards, community colleges, local utility authorities, etc.) <br />from payment of state and local sales taxes on purchases within the state and thereby diminish <br />the administrative burden on the local and state level to pursue /account for /recoup sales tax <br />proceeds. <br />TF -10: Extend Article 44 hold harmless. <br />Seek legislation that extends hold harmless payments for local governments whose expected <br />Article 44 receipts do not replace their repealed state reimbursements. The 2004 Appropriations <br />Act (H1414) amended G.S. 105 -521 by guaranteeing hold harmless payments through 2012 for <br />local governments. The 2012 -13 payment is scheduled to be the last unless additional legislation <br />is passed. The Article 44 hold harmless payments are approximately $15 million, and these funds <br />are an important source of revenue for the economically distressed counties and municipalities <br />that receive them. <br />TF -11: Allow counties to provide triple credit toward renewable energy portfolios. <br />Support legislation similar to legislation passed in 2010 (Cleanfields of 20 10) to allow counties <br />to provide triple credit toward renewable energy portfolios. <br />TF -12: Authorize greater county oversight of legal electronic gaming operations and support <br />legislation to authorize counties to levy privilege license taxes on these operations. <br />Support legislation to authorize counties to levy privilege license taxes on internet sweepstakes <br />businesses. Counties do not have the same authority as municipalities to levy a privilege license <br />tax on video sweepstakes businesses, and this disparity may create an incentive for such <br />businesses to locate in rural areas outside the corporate limits of municipalities. Seek legislation <br />similar to Hl 180 from the 2011 -12 session that would give counties and municipalities the same <br />authority to levy privilege license taxes on internet sweepstakes businesses in order to discourage <br />the proliferation of those businesses in rural areas outside corporate limits. <br />