Orange County NC Website
1Cr: <br />PE -4: Restore local control of school calendar. <br />Support legislation to restore control of the local school calendar to local boards of education. <br />The General Assembly enacted H1464 in 2004, which restricted a local board of education's <br />ability to open schools prior to Aug. 25 or to close schools prior to June 10. It is believed that the <br />Legislature was reacting to concerns by resort communities regarding earlier school openings, <br />which in turn shortened the summer vacation season and reduced the teen labor force for the <br />service industries. The State Board of Education was authorized to grant waivers based on the <br />number of weather - related closures historically experienced or for good cause based on <br />educational purposes. In 2012, the General Assembly further restricted LEA school calendar <br />control, by eliminating start /end date waivers based on educational purposes. <br />PE:S: Authorize the option for counties to acquire, own and construct traditional public school <br />sites and facilities. (added at Legislative Goals Conference). <br />Support legislation to authorize counties the option to acquire, own and construct traditional <br />public school sites and facilities. N.C. counties are statutorily responsible for funding the <br />construction, renovation, and maintenance of all school facilities, but schools retain title and <br />ownership of school facilities. This divergence of funding versus ownership requires <br />administrative work- arounds to obtain sales tax refunds on school construction materials and <br />results in an imbalance of liabilities to assets, as county- issued school debt shows as a liability on <br />the county's financial statement, while the building increases the LEA's assets. <br />Tax & Finance Legislative Goals <br />TF -1: Preserve the existing local revenue base. <br />Support legislation that recognizes the importance of county revenues and ensures that the <br />existing tax base is maintained and preserved. During the current recession, one of the means <br />used by the General Assembly to balance the state budget has been to shift some local funds to <br />state use and make cuts in some county programs. For example, in 2009 -10, the General <br />Assembly diverted to the state's general fund the portion of the Corporate Income Tax that was <br />dedicated to school construction, costing counties approximately $200 million for the biennium. <br />For 2010 -11, the General Assembly reduced the county share of lottery proceeds by $63 million. <br />Counties also saw numerous state cuts to county programs approaching $75 million in 2009 -10 <br />alone. Counties face similar revenue declines as that experienced by the state and cannot afford <br />to sacrifice any additional revenues to the state. <br />TF -2: Oppose unfunded mandates and shifts of state responsibilities to counties. <br />Oppose legislation that establishes new or expanded state mandates without a commensurate <br />increase in state resources to support service provision. A continuing difficult state financial <br />status may increase the likelihood of attempts to balance the state budget by shifting more <br />responsibilities to counties without corresponding funds. <br />TF -3: Authorize local revenue options. <br />Seek legislation to allow all counties to enact by resolution or, at the option of the Board of <br />Commissioners, by voter referendum, any or all revenue options from among those that have <br />been authorized for any other county. Several counties have access to certain revenues, such as <br />prepared meals taxes, occupancy taxes, and land transfer taxes, that are not available to other <br />