Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 09-16-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-16-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2015 9:54:43 AM
Creation date
9/15/2014 8:23:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-16-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />1 Chair Jacobs pointed out that the library kiosk illustration is at the Commissioners' <br />2 places. <br />3 Commissioner Price asked about Life Safety /ADA project. She asked if the designation <br />4 of a fire alarm system means that this is when it is due to be fixed or if it is in need now. <br />5 Paul Laughton said the replacement would happen during that year, and this is just the <br />6 program based on need and life expectancy. <br />7 Chair Jacobs suggested walking through the CIP and allowing the Commissioners to <br />8 ask questions about specific projects. <br />9 Paul Laughton said he can go through the major projects or entertain specific questions. <br />10 Michael Talbert said there is an attachment of current year projects and these are the <br />11 most important. <br />12 Chair Jacobs suggested starting with current year projects. <br />13 <br />14 County Capital Projects 2014 -15 <br />15 Paul Laughton said this is included in attachment A of the abstract. He said the Year 1 <br />16 CIP is the only funding that is being approved by the Board. He said the other years are only a <br />17 concept plan or guide. <br />18 Paul Laughton referred to attachment 1 on County Capital Projects for 2014 -15, <br />19 which totals $5.3 million. He reviewed the following projects: <br />20 <br />21 Cedar Grove Community Center — includes $2,000,000 in Year 1 (FY 2014 -15) for <br />22 construction and adaptive reuse of the former Northern Human Services Center. Final Board <br />23 decisions regarding use or disposition of the classroom wings will determine the finalized <br />24 design and cost estimates for the project. <br />25 <br />26 Southern Orange Campus (Future Planning) — Design services of $400,000 are <br />27 included in Year 1 (FY 2014 -15), with site development infrastructure work of $3,600,000 in <br />28 Year 2 (FY 2015 -16) for campus buildings not associated with the existing Southern Human <br />29 Services Center (SHSC). Expansion of the existing SHSC is included in a separate CIP project. <br />30 <br />31 Paul Laughton said the Southern Orange Future Planning is outlined on page 22 in the <br />32 CIP document. <br />33 Chair Jacobs said there has been some discussion about the Seymour Center and the <br />34 parking area being at capacity. He asked if there is any proposed plan in relation to this. <br />35 Michael Talbert said the Seymour Center is at capacity, and there are people parking on <br />36 the grass and in the street. He said there is very little that can be done to improve that site until <br />37 the SUP has been approved by the Town of Chapel Hill. <br />38 Jeff Thompson said Chapel Hill is planning on reviewing the SUP modification plan in <br />39 June, subject to approval by the advisory boards and Planning Board in May. He said if this <br />40 goes according to schedule, staff will go into utilization planning for the site. He said this is part <br />41 of that $400,000 <br />42 Chair Jacobs asked how staff would propose funding a potential expansion of the <br />43 Seymour Center. <br />44 Michael Talbert said the logical place to expand the Seymour Center is toward the road. <br />45 He said it will be hard to design this until it goes through this next process. He said part of the <br />46 infrastructure in year 2 is to redesign the roadway. <br />47 Chair Jacobs said presumably staff is going to make a cost estimate of what will be <br />48 needed for whatever expansion is recommended. He asked if staff is working on this estimate <br />49 yet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.