Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-30-1995 - III
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 03-30-95
>
Agenda - 03-30-1995 - III
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2014 11:19:58 AM
Creation date
9/10/2014 11:19:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/30/1995
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
III
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19950330
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAR-22-yb '1`HU 4:48 rte tik, w1il.1ALj <br /> PAX N EMORANDUM <br /> TO: Orange County Roard of Commissioners <br /> Orange County Manager <br /> FROM: Bid Crowther �A 64* <br /> DATE: March 22, 1995 <br /> SUBJECT: Growth Impacts on School Facilities <br /> Following the public hearing last night and after fi rther consideration today,I offer you <br /> my position and perspective: <br /> 1. The issue of raising tlmds for public education facilities is at a cr bad stage and is a complex <br /> issue. <br /> 2. The Impact Fee on redd*WW development should not be the only component we adjust this <br /> year is sw ch of it comprehensive solutim <br /> 3. Prior to ndsivS the current impact fee level,we should identify other components of a <br /> compr+vheansive formula that will provide ixae and long-range solutions to this issue. <br /> 4. A comprehensive formula could kchWe the following components as well as other <br /> a, Property Tat(FAY G) <br /> b. Sales Tax <br /> 0. Pubic Gnurts(PSBF) <br /> d. Bonds <br /> e. Sliding Scale Impact Fee on all new development. <br /> f Ordinance Revisions. <br /> 1. School Facility requirement for large wjb development <br /> 2. School Board courtesy mview of major and minor subdivisions. <br /> g. Requiring zero base budgeting of both school districts. <br /> h. Undban School Budding Plans. <br /> i. Conft&Aim ofita-ldmd service fi m local covM&on aid sub�ctars. <br /> j. Private contributions and fundraisers(wa%Ue3 front school board initiatives). <br /> 5. We will need to review our recoinusended CIP on low it addresses this issue. <br /> I took for fmwesrd to our work session on March 30th. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.