Orange County NC Website
6 School Law Bulletin Win[er iyy� <br /> Table 1 <br /> State Aid for School Construction, 1954 to 1993, by Source <br /> (Amounts in Millions of Dollars) <br /> Earmarked <br /> Portion Actual <br /> of Public Spending State <br /> Local Sales School Critical for Aid as a <br /> Taxes Building School Total School Percentage <br /> Fiscal Capital Needs State Capital of <br /> Year 1983 tax 1986 tax Fund Fund Aid Outlay Spending <br /> 1983-84 $ 8.3 - - - $ 8.3 $ 75.8 11.0% <br /> 1984-85 38.3 - - - 38.3 127.2 30.1 <br /> 1985-86 44.4 - - - 44.4 151.5 29.3 <br /> 1986-87 48.5 $ 27.7 - - 76.2 203.8 37.4 <br /> 1987-88 52.2 78.2 $ 82.3 $119.9 332.5 230.9 144.0 <br /> 1988-89 46.0 89.1 70.2 - 205.3 338.4 60.7 <br /> 1989-90 47.1 93.7 48.3 10.0 199.1 417.8 47.7 <br /> 1990-91 47.7 96.0 35.3 10.0 189.0 540.3 35.0 <br /> 1991-92 48.4 98.1 32.6 9.9 189.0 496.0 38.1 <br /> 1992-93 51.2 103.6 36.3 16.0 207.1 433.6 47.8 <br /> Totals $432.1 $586.3 $304.9 $165.7 $1,489.2 $3,015.4 49.4% <br /> (Figures may not add up because of rounding.) <br /> Source:North Carolina Department of State Treasurer,Report on County Spending for Public School Capital Outlay(Ra- <br /> leigh,N.C.: Department of State Treasurer,Feb. 15, 1994,and previous years). <br /> 1.How Does State Aid Compare with Reported Between 1984 and 1988, when statewide reported <br /> Needs? During the eight-year period 1986 to 1993, needs increased 46 percent, needs increased 50 percent <br /> state aid for the 100 counties averaged 81 percent of or more in 54 counties, more than doubled in 32 of <br /> needs reported in 1984, though most counties received those counties, and more than tripled in 11 of those <br /> aid equal to 80 percent or less of reported needs. Com- counties. As a result, although state aid to counties dur- <br /> paring state aid with reported needs, 78 counties re- ing the five-year period 1989 to 1993 was almost <br /> ceived funds amounting to at least 50 percent of needs, double the amount of state aid received during the pre- <br /> 39 counties received funds amounting to at least 80 vious five-year period, on average state aid equaled <br /> percent of needs, and 20 counties received an amount only 32 percent of ten-year needs reported in 1988. <br /> exceeding reported needs. (See Figure 4.) We can extrapolate state aid to the entire ten-year <br /> Aid was low relative to needs in some counties period 1989 to 1998 by assuming that from 199.1 to <br /> because their reported needs were high, as indicated by 1998 each county will have received only the same <br /> reported needs per student. In the 22 counties where amount of state aid, excluding critical needs funds. that <br /> state aid was less than half of reported needs, average it received in 1993. Using this very conservati%e <br /> reported needs per student were almost 50 percent method, which assumes no growth in sales tax revenue <br /> higher than the statewide average, and in 5 counties or school facilities funds, during the ten years from <br /> where state aid was less than 30 percent of reported 1989 to 1998 state aid on average will have equaled 54 <br /> needs the average amount of needs per student was percent of the ten-year needs reported in 1988, and 46 <br /> double the statewide average." counties will have received state aid amounting to half <br /> or more of the ten-year needs reported in 1988. As be- <br /> fore, the variation is due mainly to the large variation in <br /> 1988 reported needs. which ranged from 5788 to <br /> 17.The variation in reported needs per student does not appear to be $15,098 per student. <br /> related strongly to either enrollment size or per capita income--counties <br /> with small enrollments and low income tended to have higher needs per Thus earmarked state aid represented a substantial <br /> student than others.but the correlation was weak. portion of 1988 reported needs, despite the escalation <br />