Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-15-1995 - 1
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 03-15-95
>
Agenda - 03-15-1995 - 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2014 10:34:15 AM
Creation date
9/10/2014 10:34:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/15/1995
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19950315
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HOrace. . .we spent $15,000 on a comprehensive study on the logistic <br /> of getter water and sewer and Stoney Creek is in the 50 year plan. <br /> It is a part of the plan in th future and these people need to look <br /> at that it might really be in their best interest . The County <br /> should deal with this and then let the town know what they decide. <br /> Don. . ifnothinghappensin terms of the land use plan and it goes with <br /> what it is and conventional subdivisions we large lots it may not <br /> be practicable to put sewer in. . Alternative systems for land that <br /> close to town is a mistake . CATHERINE MARTIN IS HERE. . . <br /> Catherine. . . this was specific and "hot" issue. Because Univ. Was <br /> jjust finished. . . it is so site specific . . there does need to be <br /> planning and communication. Clarify definitions . <br /> Bill . . we are working on a small area plan from the inside and the <br /> town is working on >>>>we might meet in the middle. <br /> Moses . . . .do we need to . . . thecommittee is working on land use <br /> really and other basic elements on the agrrement . . . do we need to <br /> put that on the table for discussion now. <br /> REMUS . . . .needs definitions clarified . . .h'bro definitions are <br /> different than the counties . . . .Would like to take up Bill Crowther <br /> up on his suggestion. . .Bill suggested that prior to the next <br /> meeting with bocc they come back with a plan. MAY 17th is the next <br /> meeting with H'bro. . . .H'bro has a conflict that will get with <br /> Beverly and changeit . <br /> ROCK QUARRY & I-40 . . . Swanson . . they came to us in late Fall . . . our <br /> Board tabled their request and they said they could come back in <br /> January. . .we have not heard from them. . .Nello Tear. We looked it <br /> in terms of cost benefit and the use of it as a resevoir but have <br /> been on and off it . <br /> Bill . . .we would want to know about that as BOCC's . . That is deep <br /> in our territory. <br /> Moses . Therein lies the importance of the Cooperatiave Agreement . . <br /> We agree on a plan and agree to grow in an orderly manner. <br /> Horace. . . the ability/authority of the town to use it legislative <br /> powers to take in an area either satillite or contiguous and the <br /> county see it from their perspective and we need to look at it long <br /> range. We are growing and the demand for resources is growing . <br /> There is talk of the legislative halls that if you deny people the <br /> use of their land (i . e wateshed) someone must pay the difference <br /> for their land. <br /> Steve. . . our long range plan may be different . MOSES. . . this goes to <br /> the heart of a cooperative agree . You can' t agree to grow <br /> cooperatively and then agree to every request . You cannot have <br /> itboth ways . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.