Browse
Search
Letters regarding position of impact fee - VII-A - 3-21-95
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Various Documents
>
1990 - 1999
>
1995
>
Letters regarding position of impact fee - VII-A - 3-21-95
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2014 8:08:46 AM
Creation date
9/9/2014 9:29:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/21/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Others
Agenda Item
VII-A
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-21-1995 - VII-A
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1995\Agenda - 03-21-95
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For Presentation to the County Commissioners <br /> Alan Belch -Putting Children First <br /> March 21, 1995 <br /> Putting Children First(PCF)first addressed the overcrowding issue during the discussion <br /> of school construction last fall with both the school board and the County Commission. <br /> PCF put forward a Comprehensive Redesign Option that would have alleviated the <br /> overcrowding problem at Chapel Hill High next school year. The Option was to delay <br /> building the new high school and redistribute the voter-approved bond money to expand <br /> the existing high school for the 95-96 school year and to build a simplified design <br /> elementary school. The expanded space at Chapel Hill High would have then been <br /> available for transformation to a middle school in the future. The land purchased for the <br /> new high school could have been held to build another high school in the future or for a <br /> desperately needed elementary school on the east side of Chapel Hill. The plan would <br /> have had the added benefit of using existing approved bond funds. <br /> Unfortunately, this plan was not considered. Many who are now advocating higher impact <br /> fees urged the school system to go ahead with its plans. We ended up with bids that far <br /> exceeded the available bond money for the new high school. The school board cut <br /> significant portions of the design leaving a facility that many will find inadequate when <br /> complete. The bids for the elementary school funded for at least the next ten years by <br /> pay-as-you-go funds previously allocated for repair projects also came in over budget. <br /> The school system solution does little to deal with the immediate overcrowding situation, <br /> especially at the high school. <br /> The same old solutions that the board and now SOS advocate create for you a political <br /> situation where it will be much more difficult to pass needed bond issues. Recent history <br /> makes it difficult to convince voters to trust the existing power structure with bond money <br /> for construction. Increases in the impact fee will not provide enough money to build <br /> additional schools. PCF thinks that it is time to deal with the real issues and make the <br /> following recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners: <br /> 1. Hold the impact fee at $750. Increasing impact fees may have the undesired effect <br /> of stifling economic development in Orange County, thus eroding future tax base, and <br /> create a problem with affordable housing. <br /> 2. Use all political and legal influence to have the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School <br /> system fully implement the recommendations of the Pannesi report and save $143 million <br /> out of the overhead and administrative budget. This money would be available for <br /> building and education programs. <br /> 3. Immediately appoint the committee on setting affordable school building standards <br /> in Orange County as suggested by your members in earlier County Commission meetings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.