Browse
Search
Letters regarding position of impact fee - VII-A - 3-21-95
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Various Documents
>
1990 - 1999
>
1995
>
Letters regarding position of impact fee - VII-A - 3-21-95
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2014 8:08:46 AM
Creation date
9/9/2014 9:29:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/21/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Others
Agenda Item
VII-A
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-21-1995 - VII-A
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1995\Agenda - 03-21-95
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orange County Commissioners <br /> 22 March 1995 <br /> Good Evening, I am a parent of three children in the elementary, middle and <br /> high schools of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools. It is in my best interest to have <br /> safe and effective schools. Tonight you will hear that our schools don't have <br /> enough money. I disagree. I think that 23 M$ is more than enough to construct a single <br /> high school. To spend more on the existing school system is to further widen the gap <br /> between the Orange County and Chapel Hill City Schools. Given the difficulties in the <br /> County, I could not argue that the CHCCS are more important. <br /> The problems which confront us are very difficult. Logically, the answers will be <br /> equally challenging. We just can't afford the "same old solutions". We must go beyond <br /> the ordinary, "mo money" answers. Towards this end, there are several logical steps <br /> which should be considered. <br /> First, The Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools should adopt zero-baseline budgeting. The <br /> present budget model is one used by the US Congress to run up a 4 trillion dollar debt. <br /> Under this type of budgeting, you take whatever was spent last year and inflate it by a <br /> certain percentage for the next year. Under zero-baseline budgeting, schools would <br /> have to justify each program, line by line. <br /> Second, turn more of the day-to-day operations over to the school governance councils <br /> (SGC) which, at present, only write school improvement plans. With increased reliance <br /> on the non-paid SGCs, fewer employees will be needed in the central administration. <br /> The savings could be redirected to the classrooms. <br /> Third, turn the former Lincoln high school back into a school, if only for a short while. <br /> We all know that the proposed high school in Chapel Hill will be late and over-budget. <br /> We own the Lincoln high school and could renovate it within a short time. <br /> Fourth, as is common in private industry today, when demand exceeds capacity, <br /> outsource. The manifestation of this is charter schools which, under contract, provide <br /> us with a opportunities more palatable than trailers. <br /> In sum, the reason that the schools are out of money is not because we are <br /> taxed too little but that the local school board spends too much. . It is said "when you <br /> find yourself in a hole, stop digging". I say, give them alternatives, not a bigger shovel. <br /> John Reinhard (942-7811) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.