Browse
Search
Letters regarding position of impact fee - VII-A - 3-21-95
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Various Documents
>
1990 - 1999
>
1995
>
Letters regarding position of impact fee - VII-A - 3-21-95
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2014 8:08:46 AM
Creation date
9/9/2014 9:29:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/21/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Others
Agenda Item
VII-A
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-21-1995 - VII-A
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1995\Agenda - 03-21-95
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dear Commissioners, March 21 , 1995 <br /> My wife Robin and I do not support the proposed increase in <br /> the impact fee for new homes from $750 to $1000 or beyond. <br /> According to the annual report for the FY 1993-94 revenues <br /> collected in the Orange County School District represented only 27%, <br /> for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro School District only 28% of the Planning <br /> Department's projected revenues. The supporters will angry that due <br /> to the shortfall this should warrant the increase in the impact fee. <br /> There was a rush to obtain building permits in May and June before <br /> the impact fee became effective on July 1 , 1993. The Planning <br /> Department's technical report provided projections of impact fee <br /> revenues based on past building trends, without any consideration for <br /> the expected rush to obtain a permit before the fee became effective. <br /> The Orange County Planning Department demonstrated a total lack <br /> of COMMON SENSE in estimating the revenues to be generated by <br /> the fee. At least the County Budget Department demonstrated some <br /> sense when it cut the revenue projections in half for the capital <br /> improvement program. Errors by the Planning Department should not <br /> constitute action on our part. Any projections by the Planning <br /> Department should be fully scrutinized. <br /> I know some people will say, yea tax those outsiders coming in. <br /> If that was only true, it would gain a lot of support. The truth is that it <br /> does not matter if you have lived here one week or all your life, such <br /> as my wife Robin who has lived some 30 plus years in Orange County <br /> and whose family dates back well over 200 years. If you buy or built a <br /> new home you pay an impact fee. The fact is the majority of the <br /> newcomers purchase resale homes and there are more resale <br /> homes on the market than new homes being built. How many people <br /> who have paid the impact fee have lived in the County 5 years or <br /> more? How many newcomers have actually paid the impact fee?! <br /> What really needs to be done is to tax those newcomers who <br /> have lived here less than five years whether they buy a home just <br /> completed or one that is 100 years old. As it stands right now if that <br /> family of four who just moved here buys that 100 year old home they <br /> pay no impact fee. How would you administer such a program? <br /> Simply put if you paid county taxes less than 5 years you pay an <br /> impact fee. In my opinion this would also deal with the affordable <br /> housing issue to a great deal . Granted it would not solve the issue but <br /> it would reduce it to a level that is more manageable. <br /> Another possibility is a transfer fee for each deed that can be <br /> base on a flat fee or a percentage of the price of the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.