Orange County NC Website
on page 73 shows farms, and the most recent map in the agenda materials shows use value <br /> parcels. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said it is important to know which parcels have farms, which is <br /> about 27 percent of the parcels. She is not sure that the intent was to make everything <br /> agricultural, and her understanding of the intent was to keep the farmers farming and give <br /> them more ways to make a living. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said the other point she wanted to make is that Carrboro is <br /> discussing this tonight, and Chapel Hill is discussing this on June 9. She questioned why <br /> Orange County is approving this tonight without waiting to hear from their partners. She said it <br /> would be more collegial to wait for feedback from the towns. <br /> Michael Talbert said staff is running out of time to move this forward. He said the towns <br /> will receive this as a unanimous recommendation from the planning board, and there is no <br /> reason to think that the towns would have any objections. He said if the towns make any <br /> major material changes to the document, the Board would have to start over anyway. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said it would depend on the changes made to the document. <br /> She said the deadline is a self imposed deadline, and there will be no money lost. She said <br /> agricultural support enterprises are not being discussed until the fall. She would like to hear <br /> what the towns say, and she is concerned about approving this tonight and then having to start <br /> all over again. <br /> Michael Harvey said if one of the towns makes a word or language change, this would <br /> have to be re-reviewed by the planning board and the Board, as well as the town. He said it is <br /> the position of staff that there will be no language change with either of these two items. <br /> Commissioner porosin said the Board should go ahead and vote. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner porosin, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier for <br /> the Board to: <br /> 1. Deliberate as necessary on the proposed amendments to the Joint Planning Land Use <br /> Plan and Agreement; and <br /> 2. Decide accordingly and/or adopt the Resolution contained in Attachment 2 which <br /> approves the amendments to the Plan and JPA. <br /> VOTE: 6-1 (Commissioner Gordon) <br /> d. Joint Planninq Land Use Plan and Aqreement Amendments —Aqricultural <br /> Support Enterprises Within the Rural Buffer Land Use Classification <br /> The Board considered amendments to the Joint Planning Land Use Plan and <br /> Agreement to allow for the possibility of locating appropriate Agricultural Support Enterprises <br /> within the Rural Buffer land use classification. <br /> Michael Harvey noted that the Agricultural Support Enterprises conditional zoning and <br /> the construct for the Rural Buffer are slated to come back to the Board in September. He said <br /> the approval of this item would merely allow that discussion to continue, but this Board will <br /> ultimately have the final say in what the program will look like. <br /> Michael Talbert reviewed the following PowerPoint slides: <br />