Minutes 06-03-2014 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

rc I f r y I r s t list , r lify f r, t r s t s v I r r t c si r f r f r r r s s. s r vi sly i ic t t c i f r s s st ff is r si t c i t I s ct risit isa 1. y t t I f r s r I I y r . t ff s t I i v c v I it i t I ic c I i t r r t s li iti t ir I c ti i rsnly 1 la�nd us� ca�t�grsry. °This is e�hy such la�ngua�g� is b�ing �limina�t�d. . y c i i t I s c t ri s r s ri t r is iv rs I rst i t t fr is II tr t r cve yt I . 3. crr t it I i s s st r r r is iti t ` ric It r I' I s c t r vi s f It 7� ( tt c t � s cr t t t r st f t rr r r f I r is i r vi f r t 's ific ti . II t is s s r t v ri s f r s tr tt rl ffrt t r ft rs t s vl r r . Itis t fi itiv list9 f II f r r i s. It s I i y c str s ` r ' iv I t f t I r ( ss i issi r r is r f rri t t i t I i s I �. i t I i s , s r vi sly i ic t , s t s cific Ily li t y rc Is f r y s i I c t it i t ` ric It r I' I s c t Commissioner porosin referred to the proposal summary slide. He asked about the proposed change to the University Lake watershed. He asked if a current property owner with one house on 5 acres in the University watershed would be able to construct another dwelling, or divide that parcel. Michael Harvey said the ordinance establishes that any lot that legally existed prior to 1989, when the University Lake watershed density standards were adopted, receives a density bonus, where you can have up to 5 lots at a 2 acre density. He said, in the scenario presented by Commissioner porosin, if the lot was created in 1980 at 5 acres, the owner could create one additional lot at a 2 acre minimum lot size. He said if the lot was created in 2014, the owner will limited to one 5 acre lot. Commissioner porosin referred to the defacto density limit and asked for clarification on this. Michael Harvey said staff has interpreted the joint land use plan as establishing a defacto density because the language says that lots must be two acres or higher. He discussed the example of the Dunhill subdivision on Mount Sinai Road, which was not allowed to have a cluster model under the current plan, but would have been allowed as a cluster subdivision if these amendments were adopted. Commissioner Gordon referred to her email question regarding the combination of agricultural and rural residential categories. She wanted to understand the reason why these were combined. She said it has been established that there were planning reasons, not legal reasons to do this. . She said the reason for the amendments is to keep farmers farming. She referred to the Joint Planning Area (JPA) strategy map on page 73 and said it shows farms, although it does not show all of the farms. She said the Board just got a map of the use value farms in their packet, which shows where the use value parcels are. She said neither agricultural nor residential are categories on the map for the Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan. She said the category was Rural Buffer. She said the Joint Planning Area strategy map