Browse
Search
Minutes 05-27-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 05-27-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:28:11 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 8:34:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/27/2014
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - Agenda
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-27-2014 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - C1
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-27-2014 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - C2
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-27-2014 - Quarterly Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pam Davis: They don't exist in Orange County. <br /> Michael Fox: No, you didn't say— My question was if you knew about those now, would you <br /> consider them in your appraisal. <br /> Pam Davis: If they were in Orange County, and they were relevant, yes. <br /> Michael Fox: So if there was one in Chatham County you would consider that like it was on the <br /> moon. <br /> Pam Davis: No, I would consider the data and what it could show me. <br /> Michael Fox: So are you aware now that there are numerous residential single family <br /> properties that are located adjacent to existing solar farms that could have been analyzed to see <br /> whether or not there was any negative impact on property? <br /> Pam Davis: If you are talking statewide and nationwide, yes. If you are talking, Orange <br /> County... <br /> Michael Fox: But it's your opinion, you don't feel like it was necessary to look at those to come <br /> to your opinion? <br /> Pam Davis: No <br /> Michael Fox: Are you aware that there is a large nationwide study of the impact of these wind <br /> turbines and the impact on property values on homes within their view shed. <br /> Pam Davis: I saw what was included in the preliminary submission about a wind farm study <br /> that talked about values within a ten mile radius. <br /> Michael Fox: Did you examine that study? <br /> Pam Davis: I did, but that would be like saying does this solar farm impact the value in <br /> Carrboro. Its ten miles away. <br /> Michael Fox: So you think— it's your professional opinion that the only relevant comps are the <br /> ones in the neighborhood. <br /> Pam Davis: No, not the only relevant comps. But, a wind farm isn't a solar farm, and we don't <br /> have wind farms. And a study with a ten mile radius can show anything. <br /> Michael Fox: Well what you are assuming in your conclusion is that the solar farm is going to <br /> be an adverse condition, a negative view, correct? <br /> Pam Davis: Yes. <br /> Michael Fox: Did you test that assumption at all on any other known solar farms and sales <br /> next to it, or is that just an assumption on your part? <br /> Pam Davis: It's an assumption on my part. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.