Browse
Search
Minutes 05-27-2014
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Minutes 05-27-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 11:28:11 AM
Creation date
9/5/2014 8:34:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/27/2014
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - Agenda
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-27-2014 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - C1
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-27-2014 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 05-27-2014 - C2
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 05-27-2014 - Quarterly Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Michael Fox: And, are there any batteries on this site that store energy? <br /> Tommy Cleveland: Good question. No, that's— people often feel like, or expect there to be <br /> batteries, but there are no batteries. There are really only those two components. There are <br /> the panels, and they feed the power directly to the—to the inverter. <br /> Michael Fox: That's all we have. Do you have any questions? Okay. Alright, thank you <br /> Tommy. <br /> And our final witness here this evening is Rich Kirkland. And Rich, if you would come up <br /> and affirm that you were sworn, and talk about your credentials. <br /> Rich Kirkland: Hi, again my name is Rich Kirkland. I was sworn in. I am a local MAI appraiser <br /> coming out of Fuquay. I was um — I've been appraising for about 18 or 19 years now. It starts <br /> to run together, but a common bit of what I do—a big part of what I do is land appraisals. I <br /> appraise land for subdivision developers, for local environmental groups. Land is a big focus of <br /> what I do. Let's see, I'm state certified general, and again I was hired to address the question of <br /> whether or not this property is going to have impact on adjoining property values. I was also <br /> asked to consider whether or not this was a harmonious use or not. To that end, I have done <br /> research through the appraisal institute. I have spoken with three other MAI's about this, other <br /> folks who have been researching on this. And, I have found that there really is not a lot of <br /> national studies that show any information on this; so I had to go out and do my own. The <br /> appraisal institute method for identifying whether or not there is any kind of impact on property <br /> value is this idealized thing called matched pair or paired sales analysis. That is where you just <br /> look at two properties that have sold, and you want to isolate things down to where there is only <br /> one difference, and then you can measure to see if that one difference had anything. So in this <br /> case I'm looking for a property that sold next to a solar farm and one that is not next to a solar <br /> farm to see if there is anything there. I found a really good — really an ideal set of matched pairs <br /> — a series of matched pairs in Goldsboro. The AM Best Solar Farm is adjoining a new <br /> development going in. There are new homes being built. Some of the homes are backing up to <br /> the solar farm, and some of them are not. They are being sold —the exact same floor plans are <br /> being sold for the same price — both backing up to the solar farm, as well as those that are down <br /> the street. I spoke with the sales agents about it. They said that they've had no issues or <br /> concerns with that. I spoke with the developer. They had no concerns or issues with selling <br /> that. And I stopped and I knocked on the doors of some of the folks that bought those homes <br /> that back up to the solar farm, and they again said they have no real concerns with it and didn't <br /> really care. <br /> I have included in my report some pictures of the view from the homes that are there in <br /> Goldsboro, and there is also a series of matched pairs. You can see the homes that are selling. <br /> There's—This is an image in the yellow. That is the area where the solar farm was put in. <br /> Excuse me. And Spring Gardens subdivision is the subdivision where the homes are going in. <br /> You can see they are still listing. They are still selling homes out there. It is going to be really to <br /> see this, but these are the different home sales I've looked at since the solar farm. I've got <br /> different categories where I've looked at them. Some of them are showing homes that sold <br /> before the solar farm was announced. I've got some that are showing when it's been <br /> announced but not built and then those since they built the solar farm. You can see going <br /> through there, especially after the solar farm was announced and built; they are still going for <br /> the same prices - and again the same price per square foot. So it is strongly showing that the <br /> solar farm itself is having no impact on those home prices, whether it's adjoining or not adjoining <br /> through that area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.