Orange County NC Website
Solid Waste Goal & Results <br /> FY 2012/13 <br /> Category State Orange Cty <br /> Reduction goal 40% 61% <br /> Reduction achieved (1991-92 baseline) -12% 58% <br /> Waste landfilled per capita (1991-92) 2,140 2,720 <br /> Waste landfilled per capita (2012-13) 1,800 1,140 <br /> Solid Waste Current Initiatives <br /> • Conversion to single stream recycling <br /> • Cart based recycling � 1/3 of rural customers - 2012-13 <br /> • Walnut Grove Ch. Rd. solid waste convenience center - 2012-13 <br /> • Concept plan for second convenience center - 2013 <br /> • Closure of lined landfill - June 30, 2013 <br /> • Municipal solid waste to Durham Transfer Station for 2013-14 <br /> • Establish additional internal goals for waste reduction/recycling for 2013 <br /> Solid Waste Future Initiatives <br /> • Urban curbside converting to roll carts in June 2014 <br /> • Next � 1/2 of current rural curbside recycling to carts in fall 2014 <br /> • Continue modernization of Solid Waste Convenience Centers: <br /> — Eubanks Road plan in progress, construction projected to begin FY 2014-15 <br /> — Walnut Grove district site expansion completed May 2014 <br /> • Continue to consider alternatives to Durham City Transfer Station <br /> • Develop Interlocal Agreement on solid waste with Towns (ongoing) <br /> • Evaluate commercial recycling expansion in 2015-16 <br /> • Develop formalized `buy recycled' policy; paper use reduction goal for County <br /> government <br /> • Achieve 61% waste reduction goal and set new higher goal. <br /> Blair Pollack said the planning for Eubanks Road is going well, and staff just received <br /> approval from the town of Chapel Hill to work though their administrative process rather than <br /> going before the council, which should accelerate things. <br /> He said to ignore the negative sign in the waste reduction. He said the waste reduction <br /> went up. He said the state had 12 percent less waste per person landfilled, which is the metric <br /> that is used. He noted that the County has much less waste then most other places in terms <br /> of waste landfilled per capita, and this includes all types of waste. <br /> Blair Pollack said he wanted to clarify the discussion about pounds recycled per capita, <br /> where the County came in sixth versus being first in waste reduction. He said departmental <br /> opinion is that measuring how much less you put in the ground is really the key measure of <br /> success, and that has been the goal. He said the pounds recycled per capita are important, <br /> but it does not capture some of the efforts. <br /> Commissioner porosin asked if there is any measure of how much of the material going <br /> into the single stream is not recyclable. <br /> Blair Pollack said there are two components to that. He said when this goes to the <br /> materials recovery center, their out throw rate is about 6 or 7 percent. He said it goes up when <br /> you switch from multiple sorted to single stream, but the increased tonnage tends to trump the <br /> increased residue. <br />