Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2016 10:18:05 AM
Creation date
9/2/2014 11:37:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/4/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-04-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br /> 1 properties can be reached by emergency services personnel, there have been reports of public <br /> 2 safety concerns regarding the adequacy of certain private roads and other standards. She said <br /> 3 additional issues have arisen with requests to convert some private roads to public roads and <br /> 4 problems with bringing those private roads up to acceptable construction standards. <br /> 5 She said in the review of these standards planning staff would seek input from other <br /> 6 County departments to explore a range of perspectives and options. <br /> 7 Commissioner Gordon asked if there would ever be an instance where a private road <br /> 8 that is already in existence would have to upgrade. <br /> 9 Abigaile Pittman said if a road was created legally under the existing ordinance, it would <br /> 10 be grandfathered in and would not be required to go back and make revisions. She said it is <br /> 11 not uncommon for subdivisions on a private road to seek conversion to a public road for <br /> 12 maintenance. She said the class B private roads, which are often 12 feet wide and gravel, can <br /> 13 be expensive and difficult to convert. <br /> 14 Commissioner Gordon clarified that the existing roads would be grandfathered in, and a <br /> 15 new home built in a neighborhood with an existing private road would not be required to make <br /> 16 changes to the road. <br /> 17 Abigaile Pittman said the ordinance states the any subdivision above 5 homes requires <br /> 18 a class A road. <br /> 19 Commissioner Gordon asked what would happen if an existing neighborhood decided to <br /> 20 subdivide lots to create more homes. <br /> 21 Michael Harvey said if a neighborhood is going to create 5 lots, a class B road is <br /> 22 adequate. He said the ordinance also requires the accommodation of one additional lot as a <br /> 23 means of insuring access. He said if there are 3 lots on a class B private road, and a 4th lot is <br /> 24 created, that is still serviceable by a class B private road. He said if there are 5 lots and a 6th <br /> 25 lot is created, the road will need to be upgraded to a class A road. <br /> 26 Commissioner Gordon clarified that this need to upgrade is only triggered when you go <br /> 27 above 5 lots. <br /> 28 Michael Harvey said that is correct. <br /> 29 Commissioner Pelissier asked, if a sub-division had a class A road, whether this would <br /> 30 involve looking to see if the Class A road really exists versus a class B. She asked about the <br /> 31 current process to verify that a road has been constructed as specified. <br /> 32 Michael Harvey said the current practice requires final subdivision plats cannot be <br /> 33 recorded until the road is bonded or staff has verified that it meets the appropriate standards. <br /> 34 Commissioner Pelissier asked about the role of the Commission for the Environment <br /> 35 (CfE) in this process. <br /> 36 Abigaile Pittman said when the OUTBoard was considering some of the issues, <br /> 37 concerns were brought up about emergency access on trail systems. She said it has been <br /> 38 suggested that there be staging areas where trails cross roads. She said this relates to <br /> 39 Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation (DEAPR) and CfE, and it would <br /> 40 go to both boards. <br /> 41 Chair Jacobs said he has environmental concerns too, and he would be thrilled to have <br /> 42 CfE and DEAPR consider these. He said the Board labored for years to create private road <br /> 43 standards that would be environmentally sensitive. He said there was discussion about how in <br /> 44 other states you can build environmentally sensitive development without roads built to DOT <br /> 45 standards. His concern is that in saying that every private road should accommodate the <br /> 46 possibility of becoming a public road or accommodate the large ambulances, it will mean losing <br /> 47 the ability to maintain the character of the property. He does not see this concern articulated. <br /> 48 He said there are also smaller vehicles that can get down the trails. He does not want to see <br /> 49 this item result in the cutting of large swaths through trails to get large emergency vehicles <br /> 50 down. He does not see anything articulated about these concerns. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.