Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2016 10:18:05 AM
Creation date
9/2/2014 11:37:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/4/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-04-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> 1 meant to be a picture of current status and the ways they can integrate women's issues into <br /> 2 their current groups. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Commissioner Dorosin proposed that the Board provide a list of the issues of interest to <br /> 5 the HRC, with a request that they come back in May with a 6 -12 month plan to do outreach <br /> 6 around those issues. He suggested the focus should be: 1) Issues facing low income and <br /> 7 impoverished women (a. childcare, b. job training, and c. general impediments identified in the <br /> 8 County); 2) Issues of pay equity; and 3) Women owned businesses. He said this would be his <br /> 9 suggestion for a 12 month agenda, and the HRC could decide where this should go. He said a <br /> 10 specific focused direction is the key. He said the report that comes back could also detail the <br /> 11 partnerships involved. He would like to get feedback from the community to define the issues. <br /> 12 Commissioner Gordon suggested that HRC should go ahead and do the report, and she <br /> 13 suggested the Board should not decide on a list of issues tonight. She said she and <br /> 14 Commissioner Price could come up with some issues that the Board of County Commissioners <br /> 15 can review. She does not perceive that the HRC has the time to work on the issues that are <br /> 16 being proposed tonight, since they are under staffed and time is short. <br /> 17 Commissioner Pelissier said the Board needs to have a clear direction. She is hearing <br /> 18 that Commissioner Price and Commissioner Gordon are in favor of a commission, but the rest <br /> 19 of the Board is not. She asked if Commissioner Price and Commissioner Gordon are going to <br /> 20 work on a new commission. She supports Commissioner Dorosin's priorities, but they are big <br /> 21 priorities, and she questions whether a public forum will really provide the hard data needed to <br /> 22 know what is going on in the County. She does not want to hand out a task that is too large for <br /> 23 an advisory board to take on. <br /> 24 Chair Jacobs summarized that HRC will provide a status report on May 20th. He said the <br /> 25 Board recognizes that the department is short staffed and that an advisory board is what is <br /> 26 being requested. He said there are several proposals for what the Commissioners would like to <br /> 27 see, and some of them overlap and some don't. He noted that some of Commissioner <br /> 28 Dorosin's priorities would involve other departments, such as DSS. He said if the Board is <br /> 29 going to lay out priorities for issues related to women, it may be too complex than even the <br /> 30 HRC can do in a report. <br /> 31 He said the goal on May 20th should be to identify the issues that are important to the <br /> 32 Board of County Commissioners moving forward. He said once these are identified, staff can <br /> 33 determine where these issues can be addressed and accomplished in the County government. <br /> 34 He said the Board wants to give specific direction, and will take the next opportunity to do that. <br /> 35 He said a decision can then be made on whether to have Commissioners partner with HRC to <br /> 36 do this, or whether a new organization should be developed. <br /> 37 Commissioner Price said it is important to realize that they have spoken to women in the <br /> 38 community who were upset that the Commission for Women had been abolished. She said <br /> 39 times have changed, and it is important to look at what is affecting the lives of women now. <br /> 40 She said there has been concern that the proposal was too broad, so she came back with a <br /> 41 narrower focus in her resolution regarding economic development, jobs and pay equity. She <br /> 42 said now there is discussion of broadening this to include other issues, but the department is <br /> 43 small, which is why the issues were initially kept narrow. She said the narrow focus was based <br /> 44 on what the people in the community said, which she feels is as important as what the <br /> 45 Commissioners think. She said the hope was to generate data, create awareness, and address <br /> 46 the issue. <br /> 47 Chair Jacobs said Commissioner Price did a great job in stating her case, but the other <br /> 48 Commissioners have different ideas. He said if this is going to be brought before the whole <br /> 49 Board, then it is open to everyone's ideas. He said if this is going to go forward there needs to <br /> 50 be consensus on what the group wants to do. He said this was a great start, and there is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.