Orange County NC Website
36 <br /> 1 Chair Jacobs gave some history on the current convenience center fee system, which <br /> 2 was set up by recommendation from a past solid waste working group. He said the idea was <br /> 3 that it was reasonable for urban residents to pay for these centers because they could use <br /> 4 them, and it allowed for the potential of a pay-as-you-throw option in the future. He said the <br /> 5 more options offered at the convenience centers, the more people who will use them. <br /> 6 Chair Jacobs said there needs to be a discussion at their retreat about taxes. <br /> 7 Commissioner Gordon said there are two issues here. She said the Board could first <br /> 8 decide how to fund recycling and then as part of the budget, whether to raise the SWCC fees. <br /> 9 She said this second part could be part of a budget session, and it does not have to be decided <br /> 10 tonight. <br /> 11 Commissioner Dorosin said he is happy to support option 1 tonight on the landfill <br /> 12 reserves, but he feels it is a bad idea to talk about funding services based on who uses them. <br /> 13 He said this undermines the idea of community and what is important collectively, and he feels <br /> 14 it is not economically or socially progressive. <br /> 15 A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Price for the <br /> 16 Board to fund the Rural Curbside Recycling Program by using $728,260 of Solid Waste <br /> 17 Unrestricted Reserves for Fiscal 2014/2015 (Option 1-- Fund Rural Curbside Recycling <br /> 18 Program for Fiscal 2014/2015 with Landfill Reserves. To fund$728,260 from Solid Waste <br /> 19 Unrestricted Reserves which were $3,082,630 as of June 30, 2013.) <br /> 20 <br /> 21 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 22 <br /> 23 g Orange County's Reprioritization of Transportation Projects for the Durham- <br /> 24 Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization and the Triangle <br /> 25 Area Rural Planning Organization (9:45-10:00) <br /> 26 The Board considered two (2) resolutions (Attachments 1 and 4) reconfiguring two (2) <br /> 27 priority lists of transportation projects within the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan <br /> 28 Planning Organization (DCHC MPO) and the Triangle Area Rural Planning Organization <br /> 29 (TARPO) planning areas for consideration of inclusion in the 2016-2022 Statewide <br /> 30 Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). <br /> 31 Bret Martin said at the BOCC's November 19, 2013 meeting, the BOCC considered and <br /> 32 approved two lists of priority transportation projects incorporating all modes to submit to TARPO <br /> 33 and the DCHC MPO for the portion of Orange County within those organizations' respective <br /> 34 planning areas. He said these lists were subsequently submitted to each transportation <br /> 35 planning organization for submission to the State for scoring. It was determined at the <br /> 36 November 19, 2013 meeting by the BOCC that the transportation priority lists for TARPO and <br /> 37 the DCHC MPO should be revisited upon receipt of the State scores for each project to <br /> 38 evaluate whether the projects should be reprioritized with the benefit of knowing their respective <br /> 39 scores. He said these lists were meant for scoring by the State to be included in the STIP. <br /> 40 Bret Martin said since the BOCC's approval of the priority lists in November 2013, both <br /> 41 TARPO and DCHC MPO have developed and approved project ranking methodologies that <br /> 42 prescribe how each organization's local input points will be assigned to projects. He said the <br /> 43 DCHC MPO's project ranking policy is data-driven, but leaves open the possibility for the MPO <br /> 44 board to make changes based on factors such as geographic equity, knowledge of local <br /> 45 jurisdictional needs, public input, coordination with division engineers, and maximization of <br /> 46 the MPO's opportunities for receiving funding. He said that the only thing that can change the <br /> 47 output of the MPO scoring is if the MPO board acts on those considerations. He said there is a <br /> 48 value in doing this, because it institutionalizes the County's project priorities moving forward. <br /> 49 Bret Martin said the only DCHC MPO project that appears likely to be funded is the <br /> 50 Orange Grove Road extension project from South Churton Street to US 70 Business. He said <br />