Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2016 10:18:05 AM
Creation date
9/2/2014 11:37:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/4/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-04-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
35 <br /> 1 ages. However many of these assets are underutilized and better options may be available if <br /> 2 the county: <br /> 3 <br /> 4o Aligns its $50 million master plan with Chapel Hill's $50 million plan and park plans for <br /> 5 Hillsborough and Carrboro. <br /> 6 <br /> 7o Complements community-based assets such as Cane Creek Reservoir and White Cross <br /> 8 Recreation as an alternative to building redundant county facilities (such as a standalone <br /> 9 Bingham park). <br /> 10 <br /> 110 Works with both school systems to co-locate future county parks with schools. <br /> 12 <br /> 13- Use county reserves to meet short term school funding requirements that cannot be <br /> 14 met through cost savings. For the long term, better policies are needed to provide <br /> 15 transparency and to clarify priorities and controls over all reserves (general fund, school district <br /> 16 reserves, solid waste enterprise fund, etc.). This will assure that priorities are adequately <br /> 17 funded and that all operating agencies, including schools, have adequate reserves. Policies <br /> 18 should address legal reserve requirements, and disclosure of reserve balances and changes. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 We encourage you to ask staff to find other opportunities to delay non-essential projects or <br /> 21 spending in order to free up funding for schools in the short term. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 We believe that these actions and others will provide the funds needed to fully fund school <br /> 24 requests and to help keep our community affordable. In the long term, we encourage you to <br /> 25 invite educators and county professionals to work together to modernize policies for capital and <br /> 26 per student funding, and to assure everyone that schools are funded adequately and that <br /> 27 taxpayer monies are deployed to essential priorities. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Thank you for your service to our community and for considering our view on this important <br /> 30 topic. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Terri Buckner encouraged the Board to adopt the manager's proposal to fund the rural <br /> 33 curbside through the unreserved funds exclusively. She said a committee has just been <br /> 34 appointed to look at these issues long term, so the Board should let them do their work. <br /> 35 Commissioner McKee said he would support funding through option 1 or option 2. He <br /> 36 said one of the items given to the new task force is to address equitable funding and <br /> 37 mechanisms for establishing fees. He said fees could be interpreted as taxes. He supports <br /> 38 option 1 or 2 as a stopgap measure to allow time for the workgroup to bring forward a <br /> 39 comprehensive plan that makes sense in the future. <br /> 40 Commissioner Rich agreed with Commissioner McKee and said she is not in favor of a <br /> 41 tax right now without this being fully vetted. She also has a problem with raising taxes, as <br /> 42 people in the urban areas will pay more, and they do not use the convenience centers. She <br /> 43 said she will move to support option 1. <br /> 44 Commissioner Pelissier said she likes option 1, but with a caveat. She struggles with <br /> 45 option 4, as it is not really a way to fund recycling. She said this is an issue of equity in the <br /> 46 sense that urban residents do not use the convenience centers, as these are a rural service for <br /> 47 recycling and solid waste. She would like to see the Board continue with the earlier goal of not <br /> 48 having convenience centers funded from the general fund. She said this will mean less money <br /> 49 to do option 1, but these are separate. She wants to do option 1, but she also wants to do <br /> 50 option 4, though for a very different reason. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.