Orange County NC Website
25 <br /> 1 ➢ Town of Chapel Hill considering Monday, June 9 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Recommendation for Tonight <br /> 4 1. Deliberate as necessary on the proposed amendments to the Joint Planning Land Use <br /> 5 Plan and Agreement <br /> 6 2. Decide accordingly and/or adopt the Resolution contained in Attachment 1 which <br /> 7 approves the amendments to the Joint Planning Land Use Plan and Agreement <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Commissioner Gordon noted that the Commissioners have an email at their places with <br /> 10 her suggestion and staff responses. She is concerned about high intensity uses in the Rural <br /> 11 Buffer. <br /> 12 Commissioner Gordon said she suggested the addition of language to the JPA. She <br /> 13 said the attorney said it was fine to add clarification, and planning staff said this was workable; <br /> 14 however, this would have to go before the boards. <br /> 15 Commissioner Gordon said this would only be a change to page 9 of the packet, in the <br /> 16 blue sentence that is right before item C. She suggested adding language that refers to the <br /> 17 agricultural support uses as "those allowable in the Rural Buffer that are permitted through the <br /> 18 ASE-CZ." <br /> 19 Michael Harvey said staff has provided a response. He said the joint planning land use <br /> 20 plan is just a plan. He said the document spelling out allowable or unpermitted uses is the <br /> 21 UDO, and the existing language achieves what Commissioner Gordon is looking for. He said <br /> 22 the agricultural support enterprises conditional zoning district is a floating district, and it is only <br /> 23 applied when someone makes application for it. He said there is a specific set of allowed uses, <br /> 24 and if it not listed as permitted, then it is not noted as permitted in that particular district. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon to modify the language to include "or <br /> 27 those agricultural support uses allowable in the Rural Buffer that are permitted" to the end of <br /> 28 the blue text on page 9 of the abstract. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 No second. Motion fails. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 A motion was made by Commissioner Pelissier, seconded by Commissioner McKee for <br /> 33 the Board to: <br /> 34 1. Deliberate as necessary on the proposed amendments to the Joint Planning Land Use <br /> 35 Plan and Agreement, <br /> 36 2. Decide accordingly and/or adopt the Resolution contained in Attachment 1 which approves <br /> 37 the amendments to the Joint Planning Land Use Plan and Agreement. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Chair Jacobs referred to page 9, where the Rural Buffer is essentially defined. He said <br /> 40 he is opposed to the definition of Rural Buffer as a "low-density area consisting of single-family <br /> 41 homes." He said there are other uses that are specified, such as farms, resource conservation <br /> 42 areas and natural areas. He feels the listed definition is oversimplified and inaccurate. <br /> 43 Michael Harvey referred to page 57, which breaks the Rural Buffer into individual land <br /> 44 use categories. He said the Rural Buffer is a generic term that refers to an area of the County <br /> 45 that is composed of 7 or 8 individual land use categories that further define the Rural Buffer. <br /> 46 He said the Rural Buffer is just a term, and it actually incorporates the University Lake <br /> 47 Watershed area, the resource protection areas, and public/private open space areas. <br /> 48 Chair Jacobs said the simple way to put it is that the Rural Buffer is the set, and those <br /> 49 are all of the subsets. <br />