Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-04-2014 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2016 10:18:05 AM
Creation date
9/2/2014 11:37:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/4/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-04-2014
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
50 <br /> 1 mask a fraction, a small fraction of the solar array from any southward aspect of this proposed <br /> 2 project. The primary purpose of the vegetation plan that has been suggested is to hide the ugly <br /> 3 security fence, which if left unprotected would clearly not be in harmony with the existing setting. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Their vegetation screening plan consists of three rows of evergreen nursery plants <br /> 6 evenly spaced in row of progressive height. Now if I were driving past an industrial park I would <br /> 7 expect to see such an arrangement of plants, which is so linear and tedious that I would not <br /> 8 spend a millisecond looking at it. So picture these rows of identical trees, shrubs and <br /> 9 groundcover going on repetitively for hundreds of feet with solar panels peeking out above, <br /> 10 surrounded by rolling meadow and mature hardwood trees. Does this meet the criterion of <br /> 11 harmony with surrounding land? <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Now for a reality check. That industrial park, which would have this kind of screening <br /> 14 vegetation, works very hard to maintain those evergreen trees and shrubs hiding their security <br /> 15 fence. They have an irrigation system to keep the plants alive and a grounds crew to do <br /> 16 moving, week and pest control and prune to keep up appearances. That's what it takes to <br /> 17 maintain even an unnatural industrial façade. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 When we spoke on the phone to Keith Colson, who is head of the operations for <br /> 20 Sunlight, and the boss of these people, I asked him what they were going to do for the plants <br /> 21 around the security fence. I asked if they planned to water the newly planted trees and shrubs. <br /> 22 No. They have no capacity at all to water in even the freshly planted shrubs and trees. They <br /> 23 have no maintenance crew to regularly mow and control weeds and pests. All they have is a <br /> 24 site plan with a diagram of screening plants, and they are relying on your imagination to fill in <br /> 25 the glorious and lush vegetation you would hope would block the vast industrial ugliness that will <br /> 26 occur without the considerable work and expense to maintain even an industrial planting. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 I expect these professional developers will reassure you that they have a plan in place <br /> 29 and ask you to trust them. But actually it's the rosy suggestion of healthy plants that will <br /> 30 someday grow to 30 feet which is the most speculative part of everything you heard tonight. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Mr. Colson indicated that Sunlight's previous work was in California, presumably in <br /> 33 desert and chaparral habitats where screening in non residential settings would be impossible <br /> 34 and unnecessary. What do they know about growing plants in North Carolina? Do they know <br /> 35 that typically three out every five years Orange County experiences a drought during some of <br /> 36 the growing season? Have they factored in the effort and expense of maintaining even an <br /> 37 industrial façade? Is such a plan in their presentation? Where is the essential irrigation <br /> 38 system? Do you think they have demonstrated a weight of consideration about the actual <br /> 39 appearance of this project except as it might affect their projected bottom line? Mr. Colson <br /> 40 acknowledged they don't even own a hose. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 When Mimi Cherney and Daniel Mattingly, whose house is 25 feet from the field, look <br /> 43 out from their house they see a field and a backdrop of tall trees. If the project is built, they will <br /> 44 see shabby plants, dead plants, honeysuckle, poison ivy and a security fence. Commissioners, <br /> 45 please look Daniel and Mimi in the eye and tell them that the harmony they now experience will <br /> 46 not change. Tell them their property values will not suffer from this ugliness. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 When it comes to whether this project meets the harmony standard, take a sober look at <br /> 49 what is offered. This proposal utterly fails your standard. If, as the applicant has asserted, <br /> 50 there are really no actual comparables regarding the economic effect of this project on proximal <br /> 51 residences, why would you want to let a neighborhood of approximately 90 homes with a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.