Browse
Search
S Eno Drive in Orange Co. Concerns and Recomendations
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Various Documents
>
1990 - 1999
>
1995
>
S Eno Drive in Orange Co. Concerns and Recomendations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2014 10:39:32 AM
Creation date
8/29/2014 10:38:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/21/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Others
Agenda Item
VIII-G
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-21-1995 - VIII-G
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\1990's\1995\Agenda - 02-21-95
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Second Corridor (farther south and east) <br /> The second corridor enters Orange County approximately <br /> one mile north of I-85. It runs in a southerly direction <br /> roughly parallel to the county line and intersects I-85 in <br /> the same location as the first corridor. It passes through <br /> areas of steep slope, but does not appear to cross any <br /> portion of the Eno River State Park and is away from the <br /> Rhodes Creek Wildlife Corridor. This second corridor is also <br /> consistent with the alignment of Eno Drive as depicted on the <br /> Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan. <br /> The thoroughfare plan alignment was also used as the basis <br /> for another recommendation in the adopted New Hope Creek <br /> Plan, a bike and pedestrian way adjacent to Eno Drive. <br /> Recommendation <br /> While we have concerns about any highway proposed for <br /> Orange County, we recognize that the second corridor is most <br /> consistent with adopted regional plans, whereas the first <br /> corridor clearly is not. We, therefore, recommend that the <br /> second corridor be considered for additional detailed study <br /> and that the first corridor be removed from further <br /> consideration. <br /> Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this most <br /> important project. We shall look forward to receiving a <br /> detailed presentation on the Corridor Study when the <br /> consultant and DOT staff meet with us on April 21, 1992 . <br /> Sincere y, <br /> Moses Carey, Jr. , Chair <br /> Orange County Board of ommissioners <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.