Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-06-1995 - IX-C
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 02-06-95
>
Agenda - 02-06-1995 - IX-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 3:20:30 PM
Creation date
8/27/2014 3:20:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/6/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-C
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19950206
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
RES-1995-007 Resolution of BOCC Approving Transfer of Franchise From Time Warner Entertainment Co,, L.P., to TW Entertainment Advance/Newhouse Partnership
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> SUMMARY <br /> Attached is the review of CV1's FCC-1220 Cost of Service filing. It was accompanied by <br /> FCC-120011205/1215 submittals. The Cost of Service information and attached documents <br /> are substantial and in accordance with the format required by the federal Office of <br /> Management and Budget[OMB]for an FCC-1220 series filing. <br /> The Cost of Service[COS] approach was intended by the FCC for operators to use when they <br /> believed that the maximum permitted rate under the benchmark formula would not enable the <br /> operator to recover costs reasonably incurred in the provision of rate regulated cable services. <br /> CV1's Cost of Service filing for Orane County seeks to justify a basic service rate of$21.62 <br /> and CPS [tier 21 service rate of$32.34 based upon the company's cost of providing cable <br /> television service, <br /> At a December 2, 1994 meeting between CV1's corporate staff and counsel, and the <br /> consultants for Change County, the company argued that it should be allowed to roll prior year <br /> losses into subsequent years. This is not allowed under the FCC benchmark rules but permitter) <br /> under Cost of Service rules. The company asserted it was not the intent of the U.S. Congress <br /> to prohibit the recovery of prior year start up losses nor to ignore continuing capital <br /> investments in its cable television systems. <br /> Based upon the review of CV1's Cost of Service filing, the accompanying supporting <br /> documents, and the information exchanged during conferences with CV1's corporate staff and <br /> counsel, it was observed that: <br /> a. CV1's filing was supported by balance sheets reflecting activities at the franchise <br /> level only; and, <br /> b, a group of investment bankers supports the company's position that it likely <br /> warrants a rate of return greater than 11.25 S. <br /> Additional detailed information about CV1's capital strueturre is not being sought at this time <br /> because the company crated it could meet its financial and business obligations while <br /> preserving its cwrr+eut rates for installation,equipment and basic services. CV1 agreed to <br /> sustain these rates for two years, excluding adjustments for external expenses, such as: <br /> program costs and inflation. The company agreed to maintain installation and equipment costs <br /> at or below the FCC-1205 benchmark rates. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.