Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-17-1995 - IX-C
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 01-17-95
>
Agenda - 01-17-1995 - IX-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2014 3:20:50 PM
Creation date
8/26/2014 3:18:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/17/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-C
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19950117
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
50 <br /> Walters asked if the developer would be providing <br /> restrictive covenants regarding the type of <br /> construction. Waddell responded that the <br /> developer would be asked to respond to questions <br /> before a recommendation/decision by the Planning <br /> Board. <br /> Burklin encouraged the residents of the area to <br /> participate in the small area planning process <br /> noting that would provide more tools to work out <br /> better preservation options. Mr. Meyers responded <br /> that he felt citizens would be interested in <br /> providing input in such a process. <br /> Brown asked if Mr. Meyers had seen the Planning <br /> Staff ' s recommendation for this subdivision and <br /> the response was no. Waddell referred to the <br /> Resolution of Approval asking that they review it <br /> to assure that their concern regarding paving of <br /> Baldwin Road was addressed. <br /> Ms. Barbour stated that the Township Advisory <br /> Councils (TACs) are the forum that Ms. Baldwin <br /> had asked about at which to address concerns and <br /> comments regarding development. She noted that <br /> she is a member of the Eno TAC and she had <br /> received no notification of meetings or the <br /> disbanding of the TAC. She also noted that there <br /> had been no advertisement for applications for <br /> membership. She continued that the TAC should be <br /> restored so that information and opportunity to <br /> comment would be available to the community when <br /> subdivision plans are in the concept plan stage. <br /> Waddell responded that he would investigate and <br /> determine what had happened to the Eno TAC. <br /> Steve Yuhasz, surveyor for the proposed project, <br /> stated that he would address the technical <br /> questions. In regard to the concern regarding <br /> planting of trees along Baldwin Road, he noted <br /> that there are some existing trees and whatever <br /> planting needs to be done to meet the Subdivision <br /> Regulations requirements will be done. Wherever <br /> the developer feels that additional trees will be <br /> beneficial either to the subdivision, the <br /> adjacent lots or to the Roberts ' lot, additional <br /> trees will be planted. He assured the Board that <br /> at least the minimum requirement will be met in <br /> every case and that would require planting along <br /> Baldwin Road. Mr. Yuhasz distributed a drawing <br /> that had been shown to Ms. Baldwin about the <br /> realignment of Baldwin Road. Mr. Yuhasz <br /> continued that the Concept Plan had the road for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.