Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-17-1995 - IX-C
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Agenda - 01-17-95
>
Agenda - 01-17-1995 - IX-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2014 3:20:50 PM
Creation date
8/26/2014 3:18:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/17/1995
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-C
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19950117
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
43 <br /> Ms. Baldwin expressed concern .with hop-scotch <br /> development and indicated that she felt the <br /> current guidelines and regulations do not address <br /> all of the rural areas of the County. <br /> Scott stated again that the applicant has applied <br /> under the existing rules and regulations and has <br /> met the requirements. He agreed that some of the <br /> rules and regulations should be changed, but he <br /> felt the Planning Board is obligated to make its <br /> recommendation on the current regulations . It is <br /> a two-way street; some give and take, but, the <br /> developer should not have to do all the giving. <br /> Burklin observed that he agreed with much of the <br /> information presented, but felt there were not <br /> many tools to work with without an open space <br /> plan in place. He felt an open space plan would <br /> provide premium incentives, such as historic <br /> preservation, scenic vistas, etc. as tools to <br /> help developers. <br /> Rosemond stated that a definition for the <br /> preservation of historic areas has not been <br /> determined and she would like to hear more <br /> discussion of what is really meant by the term <br /> "preservation of historic areas" . She asked <br /> about the possibility of the developer and <br /> neighbors working together to determine a more <br /> agreeable development plan. Mr. Roberts <br /> responded he would have to speak with his father <br /> about such a possibility. <br /> Steve Yuhasz stated that he felt that there might <br /> be a possibility of more discussion, but, he felt <br /> the compromise the neighbors are looking for is a <br /> reduction of lots and that may not bean <br /> acceptable alternative to the property owners. <br /> He also felt there would be on-going discussion <br /> regarding buffers but he did not see a <br /> compromise that would be acceptable to all those <br /> involved. <br /> Hoecke stated that the developer has made a <br /> point about being a good neighbor. He felt it <br /> was time for discussion between the neighbors and <br /> developer, so, he was in favor of postponement. <br /> MOTION: Reid moved to accept the Planning Staff <br /> recommendation with the addition of the condition <br /> that a fifty-foot buffer be placed on the eastern <br /> property line. Seconded by Scott. <br /> It was determined that delaying a decision until <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.