Orange County NC Website
..�. v v .{r •V VV veer.r{wr.... YI{,11..{Y v[ +.....r7�.a. ..V. A {.{/ x14. ..♦./v v.,TZ4"t l . VV <br /> 19 <br /> Orange County Setback Requirements <br /> September 16, 1994 <br /> Page 2 <br /> This proposal is similar to the amendment considered last spring, except that administrative <br /> variances could only be granted upon specific staff findings listed in the ordinance (see attached). <br /> Any variances not granted through this administrative review could still be submitted to the Board <br /> of Adjustment, <br /> iscussion <br /> OWASA's opposition to the original proposal in February, 1994 was due to concern for possible <br /> effects on University Lake and Cane Creek Reservoir. Subsequent analysis by OWASA and <br /> County staff(see June 28, 1994 Orange County staff response, attached) indicated that the <br /> proposed amendment for lots created before January 1, 1994 would be unlikely to affect any <br /> property at Cane Creek or University Lake, Only three undeveloped lots of less than 10 acres in <br /> size (5.2, 5.9, and 7.0 acres) exist within 300 feet of Cane Creek Reservoir, and County staff <br /> believe that sufficient area exists on all three of these to meet existing setback requirements <br /> without a variance. County staff also point out that no variance requests have been received in <br /> the University Lake watershed, where the current (stringent) setback rules have been in place for <br /> almost 10 years. This is due is part to larger lot sizes those than at Lake Orange and to the <br /> existence of substantial shoreline buffers already in public ownership around University Lake. By <br /> contrast, County staff estimate that the owners of from 50 to 70 existing one to two-acre lots will <br /> apply for Board of Adjustment variances to building or septic system setback requirements around <br /> Lake Orange, <br /> Recmumenedation <br /> It is My professional opiniorn that, if adopted, the strategy proposed in the September 6 <br /> Commissioners' agenda would represent no discernable threat to the water quality of OWASA's <br /> University bake and Cane Creek Reservoirs, pzmculardy if the required findings of the ordinance <br /> included an additional item requiring the Orange County Health Department to verify that no <br /> existing water quality problems in nearby or adjacent waterbodies were attributable to <br /> malfunctioning septic systems installed under previously issued setback variances, <br /> Next SIC21 <br /> The September 6 strateg%has been referred to the Orange County Planning Board for <br /> development of a Ordinance Amendment to be presented at the Commissioners' quarterly <br /> public hearing sch for November 28, 1994. <br /> Edward A. Holland, AICP <br /> Director of Planning and Development <br /> I <br />