Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 7:38:19 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:18:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"'f ~/ <br />Meeting Adjourned at 7:30 p.m. <br />Summary of comments from animal control officials from New Hanover, <br />Laurinburg and Catawba. <br />Dr. Jean McNeil, Animal Control Services Manager, New Hanover County <br />THE LAW: Prohibits tethering. Recently amended to add, "attended" to the law <br />so that dogs can be tethered if their owner is present. They enacted a ban as <br />opposed to time limits on tethering because time limits are difficult to enforce <br />because they would have to rely on a neighbor's testimony. <br />WHY ENACTED: County felt that tax dollars were being wasted responding to <br />chaining complaints. Also enacted because of the cruelty issues Dr. McNeil and <br />her officers were seeing. The county also wanted to promote a higher standard of <br />pet ownership. <br />ENFORCEMENT: Violation of the law results in a civil fine. Violators have 60 <br />days to correct the violation, if they do, the fine is cancelled. If the fine is not paid, <br />it is sent to the county legal department for collection. As a government agency, <br />the county can garnish a person's wages. New Hanover does not have the power <br />of impoundment. They do not take people to court; the legal department handles <br />the enforcement in-house. <br />PHASE IN: New Hanover had atwo-year education period during which only <br />warning notices were given. Dr. McNeil felt that two years was too long. <br />RESULTS OF ORDINANCE: The law has resulted in very few dogs being <br />surrendered. Neglect calls have decreased. They get about 30 tethering-related <br />complaints a month. Some dogs probably have run loose but those are the <br />people who have no desire to be responsible pet owners. <br />PUBLIC REACTION: Support within the county. Majority of opposition has come <br />from elsewhere. <br />Elaine Modlin, Animal Control Officer, City of Laurinburg Animal Control <br />Department, Scotland County <br />THE LAW: In 1988, Laurinburg passed a law limiting tethering to 8 hours a day. It <br />was difficult to enforce. In 2000, they changed it to one-hour and the change <br />made enforcement much easier. The county (Scotland) has the same ordinance <br />as the city. They have a 90 percent compliance rate at this point. <br />Laurinburg also has restrictions on pens size -10x10 for smaller dogs, 20x10 for <br />larger. Animal control wants larger requirements, but the city council has not <br />agreed. <br />ENFORCEMENT: 1-hour time limit verified by sitting and watching. Violators are <br />given atwo-week warning notice in general, but animal control uses discretion <br />and will give some situations more time if the dog is in good condition. Violation <br />results in a civil citation and $100 fine. They do have the power to impound dogs <br />and feel this has been an important tool. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.