Agenda - 06-03-2008-6a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

37 Required Kennel Space September 10th, 2007 Page 2 The rationale for these recommendations has several components. One is that they ensure sufficient space for dogs that are kept and/or put outside. These are space requirements that would apply if a dog is outside and not tethered in accordance with the recommendations made in the Tethering Committee's Report and Proposal for Ordinance Amendment. It is understood that a traditional fence or electronic fencing would meet the same minimum requirements set for kennels. Another rationale is relative ease and simplicity of enforcement. Generally speaking, it is possible to measure the dimensions of a kennel (or fence), and the weight of a dog may be determined in a variety of ways (including from veterinary records). Background Information Our recommendations are based upon our review of regulations from other jurisdictions that have set minimum space requirements for kenneled dogs. Examples of such progressive regulations have been compiled in the Appendix to this memorandum. They are also based upon our review of information available from the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). Of the three pertinent. national organizations we researched (including American Humane and the National Animal Control Association), only HSUS offered specific guidelines on this issue. As can be seen from sample regulations, most, but not all, jurisdictions draw a distinction between dogs of different sizes, as is the case in our recommendation. However, there is considerable variation in the minimum kennel space required per dog by these sample regulations (with some as low as 48 square feet and others as high as 150 square feet). In this regard, we have formulated our own recommendations between these extremes, and in recognition of what might be described as reasonable standards. As can also be seen from the sample regulations, it is often the case that more space is required for additional dogs in the same kennel. Our recommendation mirrors this model, using a standard of half the size of the largest dog in a shared kennel. This standard is higher than many but seems reasonable given the need for additional dog houses and proper drainage in accordance with other requirements of Orange County's Animal Ordinances. While electronic containment devices and traditional fences are not typically referenced, finally, we have included them among to provide as much clarity as possible with regard to legal requirements. Our approach is very practical in that these enclosures would need to meet the same space requirements as a kennel if they are used as a means of enclosure. Questions about their effectiveness are not germane to this. discussion since, if they were ineffective in a particular situation, any resulting issues would be addressed through Orange County's animal nuisance ordinance.