Orange County NC Website
4 <br />Note: No reliable data exists that compares wage rates at independent and chain <br />retail businesses. Compensation is probably fairly similar for many of both kinds `~ <br />of stores. But, while corporate chains must msxim;~e returns to shareholders, <br />independent business owners may be guided by other considerations. Some have <br />opted to pay living wages and provide healthcare and other benefits. <br />Even when a new big box store does create a small gain in employment, these <br />added jobs often do not offset the costs of such things as chronic downtown <br />vacancies and loss of local character. A study in North Elba, New York, for <br />example, found that 68% of a new Wal- Mart's sales would be captured from the <br />town's existing businesses. While 112 jobs would be lost as local stores <br />downsized or closed, Wal-Mart would create 134 jobs. Nevertheless, the <br />Planning Board rejected the development, noting, <br />The project will likely result in a large amount of impacted retail space, over <br />20,000 square feet of which could become chronically vacant. These <br />potential impacts would have a significant. unmitigatable adverse impact on <br />the character and culture of the community by resulting in vacant .storefronts, <br />a loss of'critical mass' in existing downtown areas, and an adverse <br />psychological, visual and economic climate."(14) <br />Big-box stores, strip shopping-centers, and fast-food outlets also cost more in public <br />monies for services than they produce in tax revenues: They use more undeveloped <br />land than. local businesses concentrated in town centers, which- also requires <br />expensive road and service extension over greater distances. The polluted runoff <br />from their parking lots is placing anever-greater burden'on the nation's rivers, lakes, <br />and coastal waters. <br />E. The high cost of incentives <br />In Going Local, economist Michael. Shuman (1998) notes that in 1997 alone more <br />than 40 states offered over 30 billion dollars in property tax abatements, loans for <br />machinery and equipment, state revenue bond financing, accelerated depreciation, <br />and special funds as incentives to help cities lure in multinational corporations. <br />® A national survey by Good Jobs First in 2004 looked at 160 Wa1-Mart stores and <br />all of the company's distribution centers-and found that more than 90% of them <br />have been subsidized. Altogether, 244 subsidized facilities in 35 states received <br />taxpayer deals of more than $1 billion. (Greg LeRoy, The Great American Jobs <br />Scam: Corporate Tax Dodging and the Myth of Job Creation. Nov. 9, 2005, See <br />Alternet.org) <br />® Local, national and even global competition for big corporations has become <br />_ intense under the big-game system. Consequently, as Shuman puts it: <br />Multinationals have become increasingly adept at pitting locales against ane <br />another in their bribery attempts. For example...in 1986, Indiana paid <br />$50,000 per job to convince Subaru to open a factory in Lafayette. By the <br />19906, Alabama was agreeing to pay between $150,000 and $200,000 per job <br />