Orange County NC Website
~,~ ~ C~~~~~ C~~.,~~`t5 <br />February 25, 2008 <br />Intercity Visit Sustainability Workgroup <br />Orange County Public Hearing <br />Good evening Commissioners: <br />I'm Mike Collins, and tonight I'm speaking on behalf of the Intercity Visit <br />Sustainability Workgroup. We are a group of concerned citizens that grew out of <br />meetings with progressive community groups and leaders during the Chamber of <br />Commerce's trip to Madison WI in the fiall of 2006. We have remained active since <br />then in an effort to find better ways to implement the concept of economic <br />sustainability at the local level. <br />Our research and activities have convinced us that the key to a thriving and <br />sustainable local economy is to focus economic development efforts on supporting <br />local business, entrepreneurship, and a culture of "think local first." <br />This idea was recently captured by Senate candidate Jim Neal. Neal. wrote about the <br />importance "...of creating not just jobs, but careers. Not just jobs, but jobs that pay <br />good wages. Not just jobs, but jobs that add value. In short, quality, sustainable <br />jobs that are grounded in entrepreneurship. North Carolina's future depends on <br />building and enabling `homegrown wealth': businesses formed by entrepreneurs in <br />the State which create both lasting economic wealth and employment <br />opportunities." <br />What's true for the state is just as true for Orange County. In last week's issue of <br />Newsweek, Daniel Gross reported on the extreme glut in retail space across the <br />country. Numerous chains and big-box retailers are closing hundreds of storefronts <br />- with all the associated effects on local employment. Even. if this development is <br />able to bring in large retailers from autside, the jobs created are likely to be low- <br />wage and ephemeral. Hardly a recipe for sustainability. <br />If that is the case; then the proposed development for the Buckhorn Road site is <br />180 degrees in the wrong direction. Here in Orange County, we are used to seeing <br />our local governments lead, not follow. We .urge the County to insist on a project <br />that is worthy of the future, not a blast from the past. Amixed-use, transit-friendly <br />development instead of just another strip mall. A home to locally-based <br />entrepreneurs and forward-thinking residents and business owners, not to <br />exploitative outside retailers. A project that makes a statement about where <br />Orange County's priorities lie, and resists the temptation to follow the retail gold <br />which is, as James Carnahan recently pointed out in the Chapel Hill News, more <br />often than not, Fool's Gold. <br />Last time I looked, the unemployment rate for Orange County was well below the <br />state and national average. This would seem to indicate that the issue to address <br />regarding jobs in Orange County is quality, not quantity. So, if this development <br />does proceed, we propose the following stipulations be attached to it: <br />1. That the county require a commitment to bring in tenants who pay living <br />wages and whose employees will not create a burden for county services <br />because of inadequate employee pay and/or benefits. <br />2. That the county include a 'local first' mandate stipulating a specific and <br />aggressive level of local tenancy and ownership. <br />~~7Q. <br />