Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2017 8:50:03 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:14:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b5e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
First, the rosy conclusions of the report depend heavily on the assumption that Mebane <br />will annex this area within a year after construction starts. But, if there is no contractual <br />arrangement with Mebane to do so surely the only responsible assumption is that they <br />will NOT annex. Otherwise Orange County could be left holding a huge and very <br />expensive bag. Then, even if we accept the assumption of annexation there is the matter <br />of public service responsibility until it occurs and the question of whether Mebane, after <br />annexation, would be able to take responsibility quickly for such challenges as fighting <br />fire in a six story building. <br />Second, the effect of this development on other existing and potential retail in Orange <br />County should be taken carefully into account. Waterstone stands ready with <br />infrastructure in place only a few miles away. Would Buckhorn suck the life out of it? <br />What would be the implications for the County and the Town of Hillsborough if this were <br />to happen? <br />Finally, and perhaps most important, this document brushes off the implications of the <br />addition of a thousand or so low-wage workers at Buckhorn to the Orange County <br />workforce by suggesting that they will come from other Orange County employment <br />(which seems highly unlikely and would, in any case, be simply displacement) or that <br />they would be commuters from other counties. The latter suggestion seems especially <br />absurd. How many $8 per hour workers could afford to commute from Burlington or <br />Greensboro with $4 per gallon gasoline? And remember we have practically no public <br />transport in Orange County to such far flung places. Surely the most reasonable <br />assumption is that like other low wage enterprises in North Carolina, from hog farms and <br />slaughter houses in the east to textile mills in the west, low-income housing will sprout <br />up nearby and the costs of education and public services for the inhabitants will have to <br />be borne by county government. A careful estimate of these costs should be prepared. <br />Bottom Line <br />I do not have a clear picture at all of whether this project would,.on balance, b e good or <br />bad for Orange County, and I cannot see how anyone else could reach a sound conclusion <br />without serious fiscal and economic estimates that have yet to be prepared. I urge the <br />Planning Staff to approach the Director of the Institute of Government to request advice <br />on an appropriate independent consultant (perhaps a faculty member or recent graduate) <br />who could perform this task from the perspective of all the citizens of Orange County and <br />not just that of the developers, which is all we have seen to date. If we are told that there <br />is no time for such an action I would reply that due diligence is far more important than <br />haste. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.