Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008
>
Agenda - 06-03-2008-5b5e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2017 8:50:03 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:14:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5b5e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080603
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DESIGN SOLUTION 1F'TV]E (5) as outlined on page twenty-seven (27) of the application reading as <br />follows: <br />`The applicant requests a waiver from Section 3.1 Architectural Design -Building <br />Setbacks and Height of the EDD Design Manual and the required ten (10) foot driveway <br />setback' <br />The applicant is requesting the ability modify the existing setback and building height limitations for <br />internal property lines for the Buckhorn Village project to allow for: <br />1. A front, side, and rear yard setback for freestanding buildings and structures. of ten (10) <br />feet versus twenty-five (25) feet, <br />2. A setback for in-line shops and buildings of one (1) foot for front and rear setbacks and a <br />zero (0) side yard setback, <br />3. A zero (0) line setback for buildings adjacent to vehicular use areas, storage areas, and <br />signs. <br />4. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing setbacks outlined within Section 3.1 for <br />all perimeter property lines. <br />The rationale for the request is that it will allow the applicant to achieve the downtown center theme <br />as proposed within District II. <br />STAFF BACKGROUND AND COMMENT: <br />Within their application, the applicant indicates that the twenty-five (25) foot setback requirement C <br />would be observed for all external property lines and that the Design Solution is only intended to <br />address internal property lines. The request would result in the following: <br />Setback from • Freestanding In-line Shops and Vehicular Use Storage Areas Signs <br />Internal Buildings and Buildings Areas <br />Property Structures <br />Lines <br />Front Ten (10) feet One (1) foot * Zero Zero Zero <br />Side Ten (10) feet Zero. Zero Zero Zero <br />Rear Ten (10) feet One (1) foot * Zero Zero Zero <br />* When proposed use is adjacent to common ownersrup property such as a pnvate street, aiiey, ana <br />parking area. When this is,not the case, then the setbacks for freestanding buildings shall be used' <br />Setback from Freestanding In-line Shops and Vehicular Use Storage Areas Signs <br />Perimeter Buildings and Buildings ~ Areas <br />Property Structures <br />'Lines. <br />Front Twenty-five (25) Ten (10) feet Ten (10) feet Ten (10) feet Ten (10) feet <br /> feet <br />f <br />10 <br />f <br />t <br />T <br />10 <br />f <br />t <br />T <br />Ten (10) feei~ <br />Side Twenty-five (25) eet <br />Ten (10) ) <br />ee <br />en ( ) <br />ee <br />en ( <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.