Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-24-2008-6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-24-2008
>
Agenda - 06-24-2008-6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:44:42 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:13:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/24/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080624
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXCERPT from DRAFT MINUTES - 4 <br />May 19, 2008 <br />0 <br />1 improvement to take place in regard to an underpass on New Hope Creek. He thinks that those <br />2 improvements that are requested every year should be incorporated in this document. Also, on <br />3 page 56, under item E-1 and the second bullet, and suggested taking out the word "small." <br />4 He made reference to Appendix A and the uses and asked where he would find an <br />5 asphalt plant. Perdita Holtz said that this table was not complete and this exact table would not <br />6 be adopted. <br />7 Commissioner Foushee said that for those persons involved in the permitted use table, <br />8 most of the efforts were geared to ensuring that what was permitted now would not become <br />9 non-conforming if the City of Durham were to annex the area. Also, the focus was economic <br />10 development and not necessarily residential development. <br />11 Chair Jacobs made reference to page 66 and asked why amusement parks and arcades <br />12 were not allowed. He said that there is a golf driving range right up the road. He asked if there <br />13 .was some reason why people did not want this. Commissioner Foushee did not recall this <br />14 conversation. Craig Benedict said that Durham's code does not allow this, so the <br />15 recommendation was consistent with Durham's code. Staff will research this. <br />16 Perdita Holtz made reference to the currently adopted future land use map and the area <br />17 south of US 70, which has some economic development district parcels. This would be in a <br />18 mixed use area, so it would allow residential. <br />19 Michelle Kempinski requested that for the June 4`" Planning Board meeting, she would <br />20 like to invite any of the task force members and the community members. She would also like <br />21 for staff to provide a short summary of how this new plan would interact with the existing EDD <br />22 Design Manual. <br />23 Renee Price asked about the industrial uses that are anticipated. Perdita Holtz said that <br />24 zoning would govern the specific uses in that industrial area. There is no specific zoning <br />25 amendment at this time, but the chart on pp. 61-67 shows the uses that the task force was <br />26 anticipating. <br />27 Commissioner Nelson asked at what point the County would take the necessary step to <br />28 create an Economic Development plan. For example, there could be a focus here on IT or <br />29 research, such as a spin-off of RTP. He said that these conversations should have already <br />30 taken place. <br />31 Commissioner Gordon agreed with Commissioner Nelson's point and said that it is <br />32 imperative that a list of target industries be developed.. <br />33 Commissioner Nelson said that this conversation can begin now that there is a new <br />34 Economic Development Director. <br />35 Economic Development Director Brad Broadwell started work for Orange County today. <br />36 He said that he read through the plan today and he has a good feel for the intention of the <br />37 County and the intention of the people involved in these serious issues. He said that, from an <br />38 economic development standpoint, the County has assets, and one of them is the Research <br />39 Triangle Park. He said that this EDD is a natural extension of RTP. He said that this location <br />40 should be marketed to those tenants in RTP. He does envision a technology base here. <br />41 Jay Bryan said that he hoped that those involved in the task force would be able to <br />42 participate in the next step. <br />43 A motion was made by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Foushee to <br />44 acknowledge that the public hearing will remain open until the Planning Board review and <br />45 comment at which time the public hearing is closed; refer the item to the Planning Board for <br />46 review and comment to be returned no later than June 9, 2008; and direct staff to place the draft <br />47 plan on the June 24, 2008 BOCC regular meeting agenda for adoption consideration. <br />48 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />49 <br />50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.