Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-24-2008-6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-24-2008
>
Agenda - 06-24-2008-6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:44:42 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:13:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/24/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080624
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />EXCERPT from DRAFT MINUTES - <br />May 19, 2008 <br />Chair Jacobs said that the simple answer is that it is still in Orange County, so the taxes <br />are still captured. <br />Michelle Kempinski asked about Durham's Urban Growth Boundary and the intention of <br />Durham to extend into Orange County. She asked if there was any interlocal agreement <br />between Orange County and Durham. Perdita Holtz said that there is not an agreement for that <br />issue yet, but there is a Courtesy..., Review Agreement for projects within this area. One of the <br />recommendations of the plan is to establish an interlocal agreement. <br />Public Comment: <br />Joe Griffin has lived in Eno Township all of his life. He is really concerned about the <br />annexation into Durham. He said that it seems like this has been set up to be annexed in this <br />process. He said that in the legislature this year, there is supposed to be a proposal to limit <br />municipalities' ability to annex. He asked the County Commissioners to support this legislation. <br />David Wolberg lives in Whispering Pines subdivision. He said that he appreciates the <br />attention that has been given to Whispering Pines and preserving this. as a residential <br />neighborhood. He also appreciates that the land use plan keeps the commercial development <br />north of US 70 and has mixed use south of US 70. He is concerned that, given that much of the <br />land south of US 70 is already zoned commercial and is going to remain zoned commercial, and <br />given that annexation by Durham is likely, he is not convinced that the land use plan has much <br />in the way of teeth. Also, given what exists on Hillsborough Road/US 70 into Durham, he is not <br />really impressed with this kind of development continuing out into his backyard. He has nothing <br />against Durham, but he chose to buy land in Orange County. He has backyard poultry and this <br />would not be permitted under Durham ordinances. He sees an extra layer of government and <br />higher taxes if this is annexed. He has no objection to land being developed in this area, but he <br />is not in favor of annexation. <br />Chair Jacobs requested that staff provide a plain, simple map of the Durham Urban <br />Growth Boundary, the Eno EDD with the reserve area, the roads,.and the streams. <br />Chair Jacobs commended the staff, citizens, and Commissioner Foushee for working on <br />this plan. When this began in December 2005, people who owned property in the Eno EDD <br />expressed their frustration that Orange County had done nothing for years. It is an achievement <br />that the plan has come this far. Regarding Durham's annexation policy, he said that there <br />should be something clearly written about this in the table of contents so that someone could <br />turn right to it. He suggested that the Board of County Commissioners sit down with the Mayor, <br />Mayor Pro Tem, the new Manager, and the Planning Director of the City of Durham to discuss <br />the annexation policy, water and sewer boundary interlocal agreement, etc. He said that it is a <br />fact that, since the County does not provide water and sewer, the municipalities that do provide <br />water and sewer have their own rules about how they provide it, and Orange County will have to <br />abide by those rules. It is a concern in looking at the rates, but it needs to be discussed. <br />Chair Jacobs made reference to the mixed use and asked if someone could come in <br />with a very large retail space with residential upstairs for the dark purple portion. Perdita Holtz <br />said that the recommendation is that no new residential would be permitted in that area and that <br />retail/trade would require a Planned Development. <br />Planning Director Craig Benedict said that in the light purple area, the mixed use area <br />would allow retail/office/service and residential. <br />Chair Jacobs said that there are very few areas within Orange County's planning <br />jurisdiction where there can be high-density residential. <br />Chair Jacobs made reference to page 53 and the improvements to I-85. He said that <br />there are recommendations every year in the TIP about how Orange County wants this <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.