Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-24-2008-6b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-24-2008
>
Agenda - 06-24-2008-6b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:44:42 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:13:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/24/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080624
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 2 <br />Excerpt of Eno EDD Area Small Area Plan ~~ <br />Jay Bryan: Certainly. Is this part of the plan or just attached to the plan? <br />Perdita Holtz: One of the recommendations is to revise the zoning ordinance <br />and take into account this construct. <br />Jay Bryan: We could approve the plan without approving the proposed uses. <br />Michelle Kempinski: On page 54 on the revised draft discussed non-conforming <br />uses. Will there be any uses in this plan that will be made non-conforming? <br />Perdita Holtz: No. ~ Because the existing commercial and industrial uses are <br />already conforming as are the residential uses that were developed under the <br />secondary EDD classification. <br />Michelle Kempinski: A strong suggestion would be that under D 2, "Mixed Use <br />Area" that we further define what that means in terms of proportions of uses. <br />Perdita Holtz: The Task Force recommends that a percentage limit for <br />residential uses in the Mixed Use Area be defined when implementation <br />measures are brought forward. It is not the intent that every parcel will have a <br />mix of uses; the mix of uses is intended to occur throughout the entire district. <br />Craig Benedict: Clarified that this was the intent of the Task Force. <br />Judith Wegner: Is there a different term that can be used for mixed use. <br />Renee Price: That is the terminology used in the planning profession. <br />Jay Bryan: I recently received information from a county resident, Beverly <br />Scarlett, who owns land adjoining the Eno EDD and whose parents own land <br />within the District. She shared that she lives on property that has been in her <br />family since 1878. Her great-grandfather was deeded the property in exchange <br />for his involuntary servitude. Prior to that, the property was owned by extended <br />family formed prior to the Civil War. Her great-great-grandmother, Bunsheba <br />Scarlett, and her son, Levi Christmas Scarlett, served as slaves on this property. <br />Immediately behind her house is the Fish Dam Road. Her information is that <br />Fish Dam Road is significant because it' was one of the county's first roads, and <br />that it served as an old Indian Trading Path prior .to becoming the only route <br />between Hillsborough and Raleigh. Most important is the fact that Civil War <br />soldiers traveled the Fish Dam Road to get to the Bennett Place. <br />Fortunately, her home site has been excluded from the EDD due to the historical <br />implications. But she is concerned about what will happen on her father's <br />property where he lives. He lives just across Hwy 70 and uphill from her. She <br />worries about the impact of heavy equipment use over time and industrial use <br />that may lead to pollution or waste that will contaminate the Eno River. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.