Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-24-2008-6e2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2008
>
Agenda - 06-24-2008
>
Agenda - 06-24-2008-6e2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:43:26 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 9:12:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/24/2008
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6e2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20080624
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2008
RES-2008-048 Progress Energy Proposal–2 new Nuclear Reactors Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2008
RES-2008-049 Oppose Progress Energy Plan & Permit Application US Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Orange County Board of Commissioners <br />FROM: Laura Blackmon, County Manager <br />DATE: June 24, 2008 <br />SUBJECT: Shearon Harris Expansion Application <br />In February 2008, Progress Energy, the Raleigh based utility that provides electrical service to <br />much of North Carolina, filed an application with the NRC for a license to construct two <br />addition reactors with associated additional waste fuel pool storage at its Shearon Harris <br />nuclear power plant. While publicly maintaining that it is unsure that the reactors will ever be <br />needed or built, the NRC currently plans to move ahead with the permitting process, giving <br />opponents of the Harris proposal until August 4, 2008, to evaluate the proposal and to file an <br />intervention. <br />Progress Energy and Duke Power, another North Carolina based utility are also in a hearing <br />process with the NC Utilities Commission that will allow the utilities to present their respective <br />long-term forecasts as to power demand. The hearings, which will occur at the end of June <br />2008, serve to allow the utilities to request that the Utilities Commission approve the <br />integration of costs related to planning new construction into their respective rate structures. <br />The hearings serve as a precursor for Progress Energy and the NC Utilities. Commission to <br />apply for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (a de facto approval to construct new <br />power generation facilities). <br />There is at least one serious problem with the August 4, 2008 deadline given for NRC's <br />hearing, intervention and permitting process. Progress Energy is basing it's proposed design <br />for the two new reactors around the Westinghouse Model AP4100 reactor system. However, <br />the design for this system has yet to be completely developed or reviewed and approved by <br />the NRC. The design/review/ approval process for the Westinghouse Model AP4100 will not <br />be completed before 2011. The design, which is apparently in its 15t" or 16t" iteration, has at <br />least some iterations in which the spent fuel rods in the storage pools will have an especially <br />dense storage configuration (and a corresponding greater potential for spontaneous <br />combustion of the spent fuel in the event of a low water condition in the pools). <br />The North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network (NCWARN), has recently filed a <br />motion with the NRC to delay the permit application process until the .design of the <br />Westinghouse Model AP4100 reactor has been completed, reviewed and approved. Those <br />who wish to formally intervene in the permitting process will be extremely limited in their ability <br />to evaluate and present technical information (contentions) based on that design. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.