Minutes 05-08-2014 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

This motion is based on competent material and evidence entered into the record of these proceedings, including: • Staff abstract and attachments, including the SUP application and site plan. • Staff testimony on the project's compliance with the UDO from the Public Hearing and the March/April Planning Board meetings. •Applicant testimony from Mr. Louis lannone, Mr. Bret Niemann, Mr. Gabriel Cantor, and Mr. Richard Kirkland, on how the project complied with the UDO including the affidavit entered into the record at the Public Hearing and written correspondence submitted to the March and April Planning Board meetings. •Adjacent property owner a-mails and applicant responses. Comments from the BOCC, Planning Board, and the general public; and • A lack of competent material and substantial evidence entered into the record demonstrating the project's lack of compliance with established standards. VOTE: UNANIMOUS A motion was made by Commissioner Pelissier, seconded by Commissioner McKee finding there is sufficient evidence in the record the project complies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b) of the LIDO in that the use will maintain the value of contiguous property. This motion is based on competent material and evidence entered into the record of these proceedings, including: • Staff abstract and attachments, including the SUP application and site plan. • Staff testimony on the project's compliance with the LIDO from the Public Hearing and the March/April Planning Board meetings. •Applicant testimony from Mr. Louis lannone, Mr. Bret Niemann, Mr. Gabriel Cantor, and Mr. Richard Kirkland, on how the project complied with the UDO including the affidavit entered into the record at the Public Hearing and written correspondence submitted to the March and April Planning Board meetings. This included a real estate evaluation indicating the project would not have an impact on adjacent property value, and: •A lack of competent material and substantial evidence entered into the record demonstrating the project's lack of compliance with established standards. VOTE: UNANIMOUS A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier finding there is sufficient evidence in the record the project complies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) of the LIDO in that the use is in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and the use is in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County as embodied in these regulations and in the Comprehensive Plan. This motion is based on competent material and evidence entered into the record of these proceedings, including: • Staff abstract and attachments, including the SUP application and site plan. •Applicant testimony from Mr. Louis lannone, Mr. Bret Niemann, Mr. Gabriel Cantor, and Mr. Richard Kirkland, on how the project complied with the LIDO and •A lack of competent material and substantial evidence entered into the record demonstrating the project's lack of compliance with established standards. VOTE: UNANIMOUS