Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Commissioner Price asked for details on the buffer. <br /> Michael Harvey said it is a 50 foot buffer. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to <br /> close the public hearing. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Pelissier, seconded by Commissioner McKee to <br /> affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with <br /> the provisions of Section(s) 2.2 and 2.7.3 of the Orange County Unified Development <br /> Ordinance as detailed within Attachment 7 of the abstract package. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to <br /> affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with <br /> the provisions of Section 2.7.5 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as <br /> detailed within Attachment 7 of the abstract package. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Rich to affirm <br /> the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with the <br /> provisions of Section(s) 3.3 and 6.3 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as <br /> detailed within Attachment 7 of the abstract package. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Pelissier, seconded by Commissioner Rich to <br /> affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with <br /> the provisions of 5.9.6 (c) of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as detailed <br /> within Attachment 7 of the abstract package. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to <br /> affirm the recommendation of the Planning Board concerning the application's compliance with <br /> the provisions of Section 5.3.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance as <br /> detailed within Attachment 7 of the abstract package. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier <br /> regarding compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) of the Ordinance as follows there is sufficient <br /> evidence in the record the project complies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a) of the LIDO in that the <br /> use will maintain and promote the public health, safety and general welfare, if located where <br /> proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted. <br />