Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-17-2014 - 6l
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2014
>
Agenda - 06-17-2014 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-17-2014 - 6l
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2015 3:00:34 PM
Creation date
6/17/2014 12:54:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/17/2014
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6l
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-17-2014
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
K <br />In accordance with the provisions of Section 2.8 Zoning Atlas and Unified <br />Development Ordinance Amendments of the UDO, the Planning Director has <br />initiated text amendment(s) to require a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) be <br />held for all Special Use Permit (SUP) applications prior to the scheduling of a public <br />hearing. The proposal would also modify the timeline for the holding of a NIM for <br />Conditional Use and Conditional Rezoning applications. <br />At the May 27, 2014 Quarterly Public Hearing several BOCC members expressed <br />concern over the lack notification /information on SUP applications in advance of a <br />scheduled public hearing. <br />The review of SUP applications are carried out in a quasi - judicial process requiring <br />the presentation of sworn, expert, testimony and competent material /substantial <br />evidence by both those in favor and in opposition to a given application. Decisions to <br />approve or deny an application are based on this evidence. Hearsay or <br />unsubstantiated opinions are not sufficient testimony. Currently, the SUP review <br />process requires adjacent property owners receive written notice of a public hearing, <br />via certified mail, a minimum of 15 days prior to a scheduled public hearing. Given <br />the complexity of the review process the concern is this is insufficient time to allow <br />for adjacent property owners to gather information, or secure the necessary experts, <br />to effectively participate in the review process. <br />At the public hearing staff recommended amending existing permit review processes <br />for SUP applications could be amended for future projects to require the holding of <br />the aforementioned meeting in an effort to inform local property owners of the project <br />and provide educational information on the nature of the proceedings, including detail <br />on what constitutes `competent material evidence and testimony', and the required <br />findings that have to be made to issue a permit. <br />2. Analysis <br />As required under Section 2.8.5 of the UDO, the Planning Director is required to: <br />`cause an analysis to be made of the application and, based upon that analysis, <br />prepare a recommendation for consideration by the Planning Board and the Board of <br />County Commissioners'. <br />The amendments are necessary to ensure Orange County residents and property <br />owners are provided advanced notice of submitted SUP applications, have an <br />opportunity to review the project before a scheduled public hearing, obtain an <br />understanding of the required review and approval processes, and have sufficient <br />time to gather information and /or secure experts to aid them in the review of the <br />project. <br />It should be noted that the adding of the requirement for a NIM will add approximately <br />1 month to the review /approval process of all SUP applications. <br />3. Comprehensive Plan Linkage (i.e. Principles, Goals and Objectives) <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.