Orange County NC Website
27 <br />1 Commissioner Gordon said she is just trying to understand how the revenue is <br />2 allocated. She said it seems that the numbers should be comparable, and it should be an <br />3 apples to apples comparison. <br />4 Bret Martin said that $44 figure is operating an administrator per hour, but the marginal <br />5 cost of rolling out additional services does not necessarily include that administrative cost. He <br />6 said the marginal cost of new services is, for a period of time, all operating. <br />7 Commissioner Gordon suggested this just be taken under advisement and possibly the <br />8 two entities could figure out something to better explain the cost per hour. She also asked for <br />9 an explanation in June of how this proposal matches up with the actual Orange County Bus and <br />10 Rail Investment Plan. She asked for an explanation of the overall Bus and Rail investment Plan <br />11 and how the assumptions changed. <br />12 Commissioner Rich thanked staff for answering these questions. She said she is <br />13 hoping that some of the points made tonight would be available in case the questions come up <br />14 again. <br />15 Chair Jacobs said the Board has now provided feedback and staff has additional <br />16 direction. He thanked staff. <br />17 <br />18 c. Consideration of a Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment Related <br />19 to Home Occupations <br />20 The Board was to receive the Planning Board recommendation and consider a decision <br />21 on a Planning Board and Planning Director initiated text amendment to the Unified <br />22 Development Ordinance (UDO). <br />23 <br />24 DEFERRED <br />25 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Rich to defer <br />26 the item to the May 20, 2014 BOCC Regular meeting. <br />27 <br />28 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 d. Future of Employees in Contract for Family Specialists with Orange County <br />32 Schools <br />33 The Board received an update on the anticipated loss of a contract with Orange County <br />34 Schools, to discuss options for staff currently employed in Family Specialists Positions and to <br />35 consider the option of extending employment for current social workers. <br />36 <br />37 Nancy Coston said staff has known for several years that funding used for the contract <br />38 to provide social workers to the Orange County Schools (OCS) might be at risk due to federal <br />39 interpretation of how the moneys can be used. She said the problem has been dodged a <br />40 couple of times, but it could not be dodged this year. She said there are 8 positions with the <br />41 County that are funded through June 30. She said there is a new program coming in to replace <br />42 the program that was there, but it will not be advantageous to the Orange County Schools to <br />43 have this contract. She said the schools have decided to move on and fund whatever they can <br />44 afford to do within their own budget. <br />45 She said this has left 7 employees (there is one vacancy) who have to be given notices <br />46 unless there is a plan for them. She said this could not wait for the budget process because of <br />47 the required timeframe for notices. She said staff came up with a plan to allowing these people <br />48 to stay on as employees. She said there are two social services positions that have been <br />49 frozen while this decision is made, and there is a proposal for two social workers in next year's <br />50 budget. She said this would still leave 3 people with problems as of July 1. She suggested <br />