Orange County NC Website
Bonnie Hauser thanked the Board for listening to the public comment and opposition to <br /> this service district tax. She said the problem is not the tax, but the service model. She said <br /> the County needs to find a fair and effective way to provide a choice of curbside or <br /> convenience center services to the community. She said part of the solution could lie with the <br /> towns, especially for suburban communities in the ETJ, and that is why the towns need to be <br /> part of the discussion. She said the curbside tax discussion did not address the growing <br /> concern over the County's convenience center and recycling fees, which have tripled over the <br /> last few years. She said, even with the increase, the fees do not cover the cost of County <br /> services, which rely on sizeable subsidies from the general fund. She asked the Board to <br /> consider finding a simple way to fund rural curbside recycling for the short term. She asked <br /> the Board to start a work group of professionals and citizens to explore services, costs and <br /> fees for trash and recycling services. She would like to see the program enhanced with <br /> composting and other services. She said fees should be simplified to be made transparent. <br /> She asked for exploration of ways to fund services without subsidies from the general fund. <br /> She asked for a halt on capital spending for convenience centers and roll carts until a plan for <br /> the future is made. <br /> Chair Jacobs said the Board appreciated the level of public comment through emails <br /> and public hearings. He said the Board has worked hard to create avenues for exchange of <br /> information through the hiring of a public affairs officer, email, website improvements, and the <br /> future move to a cable ready meeting room in Hillsborough. <br /> Chair Jacobs said the Board did listen, and it did make a difference in how the <br /> Commissioners looked at the proposal. He said the Board saw an unwavering commitment to <br /> recycling in the County. <br /> Chair Jacobs said neither option before the Board is viable at this point, and there are <br /> better next steps to take. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said it is clear to him that a one size fits all solution is not going <br /> to work, due to the different levels of density and rural components of the County. He said <br /> some neighborhoods are densely populated, and curbside recycling makes a lot of sense; <br /> however a lot of folks live in the rural areas with long driveways and no curbs. He said it does <br /> not make sense to try and squeeze either of these square pegs into round holes. He said the <br /> context has changed since the Board originally looked at this issue, and there is now better <br /> collaboration with the towns. He said this change creates an opportunity to re-visit all of the <br /> options for the broader picture of solid waste. He said there is an opportunity to step back for <br /> a moment and come up with a comprehensive plan that addresses the differing demands of <br /> the different communities in the County. <br /> Chair Jacobs noted that the Board has a work session on May 13th where they will <br /> discuss a draft solid waste inter-local agreement, and this conversation can be continued then. <br /> Commissioner Rich agreed with the previous comments, and she feels that it is <br /> important to include their partners in this conversation. She said the idea of going into the <br /> general fund means the people in the towns are paying twice for recycling. She would like to <br /> continue this conversation at a work session. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said there may be more to discuss, but the fact that the towns <br /> decided to continue the fees next year indicates that there is already a partnership, and there <br /> was an expectation that the County would not draw from the general fund. She said the <br /> County has not done a good job of painting the big picture of countywide recycling. She said <br /> many individuals felt it was unfair to base this tax on property tax; however the County is <br /> already paying for a large percentage of recycling at the convenience centers through the <br /> general fund, which is property tax. She said there is already an inequitable system, and it will <br /> be aggravated if the Board does not make a decision. She said the Board needs to look at all <br />