Browse
Search
ORD-2014-011 Report and Recommendations from the County and Town Managers Regarding the Implementation of Improvements in the Historic Rogers Road Neighborhood
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2010-2019
>
2014
>
ORD-2014-011 Report and Recommendations from the County and Town Managers Regarding the Implementation of Improvements in the Historic Rogers Road Neighborhood
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2019 9:49:54 AM
Creation date
6/4/2014 9:04:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/6/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Agenda - 03-06-2014 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2014\Agenda - 03-06-2014 - Regular Mtg.
Minutes 03-06-2014
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 27 <br /> •The first allegation related to the complaint that I will address is that Orange County"has direct influence <br /> in shaping OWASA's agenda because Orange County appoints two members of the OWASA board of <br /> directors." Water and sewer service in the Historic Rogers Road Area is operated and maintained by V j <br /> OWASA. OWASA's governing board is comprised of nine members,five of whom are appointees of the <br /> Town of Chapel Hill,two appointees from the Town of Carrboro, and two appointees from Orange <br /> County. Orange County has absolutely no influence over, or involvement with,water and sewer service - <br /> or operations by OVVA$A. Nor, beyond the appointment of two members to its governing board,does • <br /> Orange County have any authority over the governing board of OWASA. OWASA's governing board, <br /> together with its senior staff, is solely responsible for administrative and operational decisions regarding <br /> OWASA's provision of water and sewer service. The OWASA organizational chart may be viewed here. <br /> As you will see Orange County is nowhere in the organizational chart. You will also not find any <br /> indication whether through board minutes, notes, news reports, or any other source that Orange County - <br /> has any influence over OWASA's agenda,activities or operations. <br /> Another allegation is that Orange County sought grants from the EPA for the Efland and Buckhorn areas <br /> and intentionally refused to seek grants for the Historic Rogers Road area. This also is false. Neither <br /> Orange County nor the Orange County Planning and Inspections Department unilaterally sought grants <br /> from the EPA for the expansion of wastewater systems in the Efiand and Buckhorn communities. <br /> Congressman David Price earmarked funds in 2003[Consolidated Appropriations Resolution,2003, <br /> (P,L. 108-7)1 and 2005[Consolidated Appropriations Act,2005, (P.L. 108-447)1 for the aforementioned <br /> areas. Upon the funds becoming available the Orange County Planning and inspections Department <br /> followed guidelines set forth by EPA Region 4 for special appropriation projects("SPAP")to receive the <br /> grant awards including permission from the Orange County Board of Commissioners to pursue the <br /> earmarked/allocated wastewater grants, but did not formally apply for the earmarked funds. <br /> In 2004 the County retained an engineering firm to begin designs for the areas on which the SPAPs were • <br /> to be expended. In 2009 engineering design was still underway but no formal application had been <br /> made for the SPAP funds when the County was notified that unused SPAPs could be rescinded and/or <br /> forfeited if not formally applied for with the associated paperwork for receipt of funds. Due to the <br /> possibility of the funds becoming unavailable Orange County formally applied for the funds in 2010. <br /> Some additional information of which EPA staff may not be aware is as follows: Beginning last year,the <br /> Orange County Board of Commissioners.commissioned a task force comprising residents of the Rogers <br /> Road Area,Orange County Commissioners,Carrboro Aldermen,and Chapel Hill Town Council members <br /> to examine what could be done in the Rogers Road Area to assist the community. In the course of Its <br /> work I received notice of the EPA investigation: Upon my receipt of that notice I immediately advised the • <br /> Orange County Board of Commissioners that it should suspend any expenditure of funds in the Rogers <br /> Road Area until such time as the investigation is closed and we can determine what,if anything, EPA <br /> would demand of Orange County. Despite this,the task force has continued its work and is scheduled to <br /> present its recommendations to the county,and town governing bodies on November 21st. Among other <br /> things the task force is recommending the construction of a public community center and the extension of <br /> sewer lines in the Rogers Road Area. • <br /> The construction of a public community center in the area is proceeding. This project has been approved <br /> by the Orange County Board of Commissioners for an approximately 4000 square foot structure with a <br /> construction budget of up to$700,000. Initial bids have been rejected because those bids came in at - <br /> almost double the amount budgeted,however,the project is being re-bid. <br /> The extension of sewer lines represents a substantially larger investment of public dollars and for this <br /> reason in light of the open investigation I have continued to advise the Board of Commissioners to <br /> suspend consideration of the extension of sewer lines for so long as the investigation remains open. As - <br /> I'm sure you realize the reason for this recommendation is that Orange County could expend millions of ' <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.